this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

14 readers
2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I thought that was interesting. Obviously Chet has been more impactful but I didn't realize there was that much difference between the two in terms of +/-.

Source - https://www.nba.com/stats/players/traditional?PlayerExperience=Rookie&dir=A&sort=PLUS_MINUS&PerMode=Totals

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] figgnootun@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The thunder are 2.6 points per 100 possessions better when Chet is on the floor vs when he is off. The spurs are 5.5 points per 100 possessions better when Victor is on the floor vs when he is off.

Chet is already a great player and contributing to winning basketball as the second best player on a playoff team with great offball skills, good defense, and flashes of primary creation. He’s still less important to the thunder than Wemby is to the spurs.

Again Chet’s been the significantly better shooter and more polished player and had a huge impact on the thunder but they are an all around good team. The spurs without Wemby on the floor are barely an nba team getting outscored by around 16 points per 100 when he’s not playing.

[–] OguguasVeryOwn@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Came here looking for this comment. Far better to compare individual impact to net rating when their overall teams are so diametrically opposite.

[–] Friendly-Thought-973@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Those on/off splits aren’t true when you use Cleaning the Glass which adjusts for garbage time.

But I’m sick of this argument it’s the same talking points over and over again.

[–] madhare09@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Bro half our games are garbage time. I don't see how you can't include garbage time in any spurs players stats lol. You'd have Vic with 15 mins a game.