this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

14 readers
1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a simple formula for trying to figure out things like who has been better on the year, or who is most deserving of awards, that isn’t narrative based. Imo, it’s taking what’s considered the best all in one stat, and ranking players for awards based off of that.

Formula is simple: add epm and estimated win numbers together. Early in the season, epm will have more of an influence on the rankings. Later in the season, actual output in estimated wins will have more of an influence.

Without further ado.

  1. Nikola Jokic: 11.7

  2. SGA: 11.1

  3. Embiid: 11.0

  4. Lebron: 9.5

  5. Haliburton: 9.2

  6. Chet: 9.0

  7. Scottie Barnes: 8.9

  8. Curry: 8.8

  9. Booker 8.5

  10. Durant: 7.7

It’s still incredibly early in the season, so the rankings above are obviously still liable to change. What I found interesting is Lebron being in the top 5 still at his age (and improving on where he was at last year at this point in time), Chet being in the top 10 (honestly, the biggest stand out), and that Scottie Barnes seems to have clearly taken a leap in terms of his on the court impact. At the moment, the real MVP race seems to be between Jokic, Embiid, and SGA (the two usual suspects and SGA being added to the mix).

OKC’s time, as far as being more focused on winning now instead of the future, may be happening sooner than they thought, and there could be a chance that the organization flips sometime this year or next on moves to improve the team’s play now at the cost of future assets. Both SGA and Chet seem legit in their early run this season. According to epm, on the season (a limited sample size of course), they’re currently the best duo in the league.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sharklavapit@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

this adjusted plus minus stats are awful on small sample sizes

you should only "use" EPM for full seasons

[–] NicolasName@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I agree. I've done this for myself last two seasons after the all-star break.

All the discussions about these awards are pretty awful to start the year. It still has some interesting things to say. I.e. SGA, Lebron, Chet, Scottie Barnes have started off the year playing all-nba level ball (and MVP level for SGA). Of course, the data could be noisy, and things can change going forward.