this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NBA - Main
14 readers
4 users here now
Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Blake was a great dunker and a good player but this is brutally wrong on both takes.
Blake > Vince is arguable though, especially when you look at individual achievements. Both were constant 1st/2nd round exits as the no.1 option. Blake made 5 All NBA teams, while Vince made 2. Blake finished 3rd in MVP voting, while the highest Vince ever finished was 10th. I'm not saying it's a surefire thing, because of the different eras, opponents, position availabilty etc, but it's definitely arguable.
Not arguable at all.
Vince was on another planet
In terms of individual ability and potential, yeah I agree. But in terms of actually getting the results, I don't think so.