this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
870 points (99.8% liked)

News

39967 readers
3483 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person or their instance. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The entire world have put plans in motion to cut out the US.

That's great if it's true -- but if it IS true, then why is everyone in this thread all upset by me being fine with it? Why are people trying to sell me so hard on keeping the status quo, telling me about "trusted partnerships," using vague and awkward hypotheticals like "punched in the face" and even pulling out the ad hominems when I say let's accept what it is?

It appears that a great many of you are deeply, deeply upset that we Americans did in fact beat the odds and do the impossible and you do NOT actually want to accept that the old world order is gone.

Whatever this new day is, I am perfectly fine with moving forward into. I don't care what other countries trust and don't trust, because it no longer matters: the orange chancre has destroyed everything that once did. I am not for resurrecting it.

So why are you all so upset? Why do you need me, specifically, one American guy, to want your trust? Why do you need me to pretend like I don't like the status quo?

You're all telling me that you're doing great without the US, and that's the best response that could be hoped for. You're all telling me you don't trust the US, and that's perfect too: rebuild yourselves without us. You're all telling me that the US has nothing to do with funding the security of other countries: great! You can't miss what you never had, then.

And your own entire comment. Clearly, it is intended to trigger some visceral response in me, because healthcare does that to a lot of people, and your response was crude and ugly. But the question is, and remains, why? Why is that such a threat to you personally that you have to come back with something you thought would personally discomfit me?

So why all the long faces? What is it you all REALLY want from me that you're not getting? What's all the bad attempts at sophistry in aid of? When the other day everyone was insisting "Fix your shit!" and we pulled off a miracle, and you're all happy as clams exactly the way you are, and you don't need the US and you don't trust us and you never will again if even then, WHY do you need me to give a shit about your trust?

Because I honestly cannot be bothered. Find someone else to mirror your hypocrisy to. You got the wrong guy.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

Because I honestly cannot be bothered. Find someone else to mirror your hypocrisy to. You got the wrong guy.

You replied to me. And you're the one replying to everyone with a novella's worth of words.