this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

24 readers
1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoneyyay@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. Screenprotectors are cheaper than this shit update. Although if Sony hears that you may be forced to use viewfinder if they detect an aftermarket screen guard, and disable your screen

[–] Provia100F@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sony should just introduce proprietary memory cards that only hold a certain number of pictures per card, and the cards are one time use only.

Maybe something like 24 or 36 pictures, to make it manageable.

[–] rpkarma@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I unironically wanted part of this haha, where I wanted a modern memory card with a small capacity to force me to use it like my film cameras.

Then I realised I could get the same effect by putting a multi-GB useless file on it lol

[–] Provia100F@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or just use a film camera lol

[–] rpkarma@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do, lots! But film is expensive :)

[–] Tchrspest@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

And lorem ipsum text is cheap.

[–] MarGatoRueda@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Finally, we’ve come full circle now all based on corporate greed?

[–] Provia100F@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Kodak is weeping tears of joy, they were right all along!

Sony has had a history with making proprietary storage cards for its handheld gaming devices instead of simply letting you use SD cards, so it's not out of the conversation