NBA - Main

14 readers

1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@nba.space

The Gobert Trade: Starting to Pay Dividends (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by nickwaynek@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

189 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Timberwolves now sit at 13-4, the current #1 seed in the Western Conference, almost 1/4 through the season.

Rudy Gobert defensive rating: 102.3 (#1 in the league)

KAT defensive rating: 104 (#2 in the league this year / averaged 109 historically)

Timberwolves: 106.6 (#1 in the league)

If they make the finals this year; are we still saying it was an overpay?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nickwaynek@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (7 children)

If it yields a championship I think I'm "overpaying" every time.

[–] IDGAFaboulrVB@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

People thought the bucks "overpaid" Jrue Holiday until it brought them a championship banner

It's always 100% worth it

[–] WD51@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Only if it works out. Like the Kawhi trade. Ball bounces slightly off for a split second and suddenly you traded your franchise player and picks for a 1 year rental that ended in ECF appearance.

[–] InterCityzen@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

It wasn't the trade that brought them the championship with all due respect

[–] norris528e@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Lakers were fleeced for AD

[–] CynicalMindTrip@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Every championship is overpaid, with fee lucky exceptions.

[–] maddenallday@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That is a huge "if" lol. Winning a championship is a bit different from going 13-4.

[–] Comrade_Falcon@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

But we've already made the #1 in the west November 2023 Banner.

[–] westglendalegolfer@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

This exactly. Irrational Lakers haters (like BS) have been saying for multiple years we gave up too much for AD and the “Mickey mouse” ring. But I’d want the front office to do it again.

[–] LeBremsstrahlung@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah but it still remains to be seen. Anything less than multiple deep playoff runs and it’s a bad trade. Who were they bidding against?

[–] C4242@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Even if we "win" the trade, it's an overpay. Simply because we seemed to be only out bidding ourselves.

We got fleeced, but both the Jazz and the Wolves can come out winners.

[–] ChargeWithThunder@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Every single time and then some. So many teams don’t make certain trades because the risk involved in potentially losing value and coming up empty handed, but winning it all or even making it to the finals is extremely hard. We see a lot of teams that have won it all taking these risks. Bucks with jrue trade looking like a bad trade but it won them a ring, raptors with kawhi was arguably one of the riskiest trades in recent memory but it won them a ring. Lakers trading literally everything but staples for ad but they got a ring out of it. Cavs trading the #1 pick with massive upside for klove was a risk (albeit not nearly as big as the others) and they won a ring. Obviously if you win a ring , you take those trades every time. And obviously it doesn’t always work out (looking at you harden multiple times, Kyrie, pg)