this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

143 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NinjaKoala@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He didn't signal play on. Play on is signalled by two arms pointing, he had one up. He saw Haaland flying, didn't expect him to get back on his feet, so he blew the whistle and called a foul. So the defenders paused. Grealish is only free because he kept playing despite the whistle being blown. So he should have let play continue, but it wouldn't have been Grealish free on goal if he hadn't blown it dead.

[–] theglasscase@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

He saw Haaland flying, didn't expect him to get back on his feet, so he blew the whistle and called a foul. So the defenders paused. Grealish is only free because he kept playing despite the whistle being blown.

This is a blatant, embarrassing lie. Hooper does not blow his whistle until after Haaland has played the pass.