this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
283 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2525 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
283
Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators (theconversation.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
96 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators::As AI developers indiscriminately suck up online content to train their models, artists are seeking ways to fight back.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The ratio of using AI to replace ad art:fraud/plagiarism has to be somewhere around 1:1000.

“Actual productivity” is a nonsense term when it comes to art. Why is this less “meaningful” than this?

Without checking the source, can you even tell which one is art for an ad and which isn’t?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

I would assume the first to be an ad, because most of depicted people look happy