this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
160 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

40132 readers
535 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What are you using as a Google photos alternative? Currently I'm using Nextcloud but I'm thinking of switching to a more dedicated solution.

I mainly need to upload photos from my device automatically, have an UI to see and classify them, albuns and sharing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supersheep@lemmy.world 101 points 10 months ago (7 children)
[–] controlphreak@lemmy.ml 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Thread is over, because this is the only correct answer.

[–] stackPeek@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Interestingly only one or two years ago, people seems tp recommend PhotoPrism

[–] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yep, until PhotoPrism revealed themselves to be the greedy cunts they are.

I sponsor my favourite tech projects annually, as I believe in supporting independent and responsible open-source development.

I became a paid Github sponsor for PhotoPrism because they promised features like multi-user were coming, and they indicated that paid sponsors would get access. After what seemed way too long a wait, they finally released the features many of us had been waiting for, only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users. 🤨

So, I switched to Immich about 6 months ago. I've found Alex and the rest of the team to be very active, and quite responsive to support requests, including on Discord. Additionally, the development is fast-paced and new features are coming all the time.

My money's going to Immich. PhotoPrism can go get fucked.

[–] azron@lemmy.ml -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The user feature is available for non paying users too. If you want a gui for managing that is now behind plus. I don't see exactly how wantng to make a living off of your work makes you a greedy cunt especially when it seems the features trickle down as they should. Am I missing something?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's about expectation setting. You can't say "paid donators will get X" then say "actually you won't, give us more money for X".

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 12 points 10 months ago

Also, there's usually no reason as a user to pay monthly for a feature in a self-hosted application.
The Dev has no monthly costs for that feature. Let me buy the application/feature, and if you need money for a new feature, create a feature that is worth buying again. No need to bully the user into a monthly subscription...

[–] azron@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

I missed that bait and switch. Thank you for the response.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah. The Premium model is kinda bullshit. As a free tier open source user you will always be a second class citizen.

Also everyone who wants to commit code has to sign away his rights for them.

tl;dr maintainer gets money from open source contribution over the premium tier, but hinders everyone else to do the same with the AGPL licence.(kinda)

That's not a good foundation to start off.

[–] azron@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So you think it is bad cause others can't take their work and make money off of it? Seems to be a real problem in open source right now that others are doing exactly that and something I don't begrudge a small development team doing.

Not affiliated with them just been using and happily subscribed for a year+ now. Better than Google getting my money.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, i think it is bad that the owner takes away the rights from the contributors.

AGPL alone does already solve the problem.

But both, is not sustainable.

Also the trademark owner can relicense the code anytime and just close the source. It is not community project

I think many developer feel like me. Just look at the contributor list on both projects.

[–] azron@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

That's a fair point. I think you are right that it is not a community project. Something for me to consider. Thanks for the response.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 10 months ago

Immich iirc has seen huge and rapid development in the past two years so no surprise.

[–] eek2121@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] emhl@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Pixelfed is an Instagram alternative and not a Google photos alternative afaik

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Definitely Immich.

There's a lot of these kinds of services, hosted or self-hosted that are labeled as a "Google Photos replacement"

But very few of said services have features like face matching and object recognition alongside automatic backups.

IMO it's not a legitimate replacement for Google Photos without those features and Immich really delivers on that without compromising your privacy.

[–] Alborlin@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hi is there a guide for Complete Newbie like me , right from how to download this software(I could not find link or anything resembling.exe for installation,) upptill how doninput it on my zorin os laptop and setup my and my familys phone to upload photos to our own laptops via immich. Like a a book idiots guide to xyz... Kind of thing

[–] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think this is hard to answer because there's no "one way" to do this.

Do you want it accessible only in your house, and you're running something like a raspberry pi? That's one set of instructions.

Do you want it accessible from anywhere in the world, with proper TLS? That's a little more complicated, and there are a million ways to do this


do you want to self host and expose public IP? Self host using a VPN as the entry point? Host on a VPS?

I would recommend playing around with it first. This is easiest if you can get a well-supported environment, so something like a raspberry pi is best IMHO if you want to play around with minimal frustration.

[–] Alborlin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Hi thanks for your reply. I have laptop with external drive that i use as server at home. Ideally as easy part1 i would only upload pictures home, and would access them home only. This is not a public intelltual property, it's our photos so no public IP needed.

What i am looking is

My and familys phones are getting full of pics and videos, so instead of using Google Photos can we upload it our own server at home easily and wirelessly. If need be we can watch them on tv . That's it.

[–] jkjustjoshing@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

“IP” in this context means “internet protocol address”. A public IP is one that can be accessed from outside your home (what you see when you go to https://whatismyipaddress.com/). A non-public, or internal, IP is the one your router gives your computer, frequently starting with 192.168. This can be accessed by other computers on your network but not from outside your network.

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a Windows app.

You can run it on Windows with Docker, but I would suggest a Linux server and a reverse proxy for the best experience (like most self-host solutions)

The installation documentation is here

And here

[–] Alborlin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hi Thanks for reply, I would be putting it in zorin os laptop (that is linux) , What do I reserve proxy för ?

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It is great, but the mobile app becomes slow AF when I import all my google photos which are thousands of them. Even after indexing has finished.

Edit: Scratch what I said! Just gave Immich another shot, and the slow mobile app was due to the initial background sync running.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How many photos? It's a very good user experience for me, with 123GB library (23k+ photos, 1k+ videos). Fairly entry-level Samsung phone and iPhone 13, both work great.

Running on an Orange Pi 5 Plus.

Absolutely love Immich. Was previously running on an RPi 4 w/4GB RAM, but with the other services I had on there I needed to disable ML. Orange Pi 5 Plus (16GB RAM) and it's just a dream. Kicked off ML/facial recognition before bed and it was done in the morning. Migration from RPi to OPi was straightforward.

[–] sacbuntchris@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What is different about an Orange Pi compared to a Raspberry Pi? Thinking about taking the plunge into self hosting and I'm looking for something easy and powerful.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Big difference for me between the RPi 5 and orange pi 5 Plus is more RAM and m.2 NVME support on board. It also has four additional efficiency cores and dual 2.5G NICs, but that's less important to me.

Downside is it has a less polished ecosystem.

Overall though I've been happy! But I also love my collection of raspberry pis, so it's a matter of taste I guess.

[–] sacbuntchris@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 3 points 10 months ago

Yep, Immich is tha bomb! Able to completely clear out google photos!

[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Pleased that I came to this thread looking for a good answer, clicked this link and opened in my preferred browser for project tracking and saw it was already starred in GitHub. Guess I need to actually deploy an image finally and stop lurking for an answer. Lol

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I wish it didn't require docker :(

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's hard for me. I've tried, but not had much success.

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

you should really take some time and learn it. It's a godsend.

[–] sundaylab@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Same here. I'm using mainly FreeBSD on my servers so docker is a no go due to lack of support. I have to stick with Photoprism for now as it offers a install without docker and it does the job for me. Anyhow, I'm not happy with the trend that most FOSS projects today limit the deployment on docker and do not offer a way of a plain install on you *nix system of choice.