this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
747 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hope this isn't a repeated submission. Funny how they're trying to deflect blame after they tried to change the EULA post breach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

A successful breach of a family member's account due to their bad security shouldn't result in the breach of my account. That's the problem.

Edit: so people stop asking, here's their docs on DNA relatives: https://customercare.23andme.com/hc/en-us/articles/212170838

Showing your genetic ancestry results makes select information available to your matches in DNA Relatives

It clearly says select information, which one could reasonably assume is protecting of your privacy. All the reports seem to imply the hackers got access to much more than just the couple fun numbers the UI shows you.

At minimum I hold them responsible for not thinking this feature through enough that it could be used for racial profiling. That's the equivalent of being searchable on Facebook but they didn't think to not make your email, location and phone number available to everyone who searches for you. I want to be discoverable by my friends and family but I'm not intending to make more than my name and picture available.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

A successful breach of a family member’s account due to their bad security shouldn’t result in the breach of my account. That’s the problem

I mean...

You volunteered to share your info with that person.

And that person reused a email/password that was compromised.

How can 23andme prevent that?

It sucks, but it's the fault of your relative that you entrusted with access to your information.

No different than if you handed them a hardcopy and they left it on the table of McDonald's .

Quick edit:

It sounds like you think your account would be compromised, that's not what happened. Only info you shared with the compromised relative becomes compromised. They don't magically get your password.

But you still choose to make it accessible to that relatives account by accepting their request to share

[–] dmonzel@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Could I please have your personal information?

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] dmonzel@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok, who else would be able to give me your personal information. I'll go get it from them instead.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your mom has my contact information. You can ask her.

/pwn3d.

[–] dmonzel@lemmy.ml -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh, so you're actually not consenting to have some personal information you've given to family given to me as well? Odd, you sure seemed ok when it was people having their information snagged from 23andMe.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

No, but I didn't consent to give that info to family either. If I was worried about my data getting in the hands of strangers, I wouldn't have shared it with strangers which is what happened here. Unless you count a 4th cousin that you've never met "family", why would you give them access to your data?

[–] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Yep it was 14,000 that were hacked, the other 6.9 million were from that DNA relative functionality they have. Unfortunately 23andMe's response is what to expect since companies will never put their customers safety ahead of their profits.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I doesn't. Sharing that info was opt-in only. In this scenario, no 23andMe accounts were breached. The users reused their credentials from other sites. It would be like you sharing your bank account access with a family member's account and their account getting accessed because their banking password was "Password1" or their PIN was "1234".

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

afaik there was no breach of private data, only the kind of data shared to find relatives, which is opt-in and obviously not private to anyone who has seen how this service works. In other words, the only data "leaked" was the kind of data that was already shared with other 23andMe users.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

So if you enabled a setting that is opt-in only that allows sharing data between accounts and you are surprised that data was shared between accounts how is that not your fault?

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

You shouldn’t have shared your information with someone who is untrustworthy then. Data sharing is opt-in.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Even if you didn’t reuse a compromised password yourself, the fact that your relatives did indicates that you’re genetically predisposed to bad security practices. /s