this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
583 points (97.7% liked)

Risa

6915 readers
14 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I've just started a Voyager run through with my kids. Dare I say S1 of Voyager is a much better introduction to "modern" Trek than the fairly uneven S1 TNG? I think Janeway is underrated as a Star Fleet captain.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She is! Always wondered why she got so much hate in the community. Not as much as Archer did though. Which is also great IMHO.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Janeway didn't get hate as much as it was criticism of the writers for making her inconsistent. One week it was "Prime directive no matter the consequences", the next was "Lets do whatever to make drama."

For all of Roddenberry's faults, his presence for the early years of TNG kept TNG consistent instead of allowing the writer of the week to change characters for their personal story. By the time he was gone, the formula was set such that writers wouldn't mess with characters.

Voyager has no singular authority so consistency of character was rare.

Edit: Except for Ensign Kim. He was born an Ensign and died one. Nobody messed with perfection.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

He was born an Ensign and died one.

Several times.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I've actually come to think of Janeway as someone consistently written to be an inconsistent Captain, rather than 100% inconsistently written. Others are nowhere near as inconsistent as Janeway.

Once I started thinking of her inconsistency as being the result of trying to walk a tightrope of sticking to Starfleet ideals, as well as maintaining order in a demoralised crew in unfamiliar territory where they don't have the support and full might of the Federation and its allies behind them, Janeway's inconsistent and contradictory behaviour starts making a lot more sense and feels a lot more organic.

[–] derek@social.coop 4 points 10 months ago

@TheGrandNagus Kinda makes sense that way. Flung into trouble because of her adherence to the Prime Directive, then had to do whatever it took to get the crew home... I'd waffle about, too.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

You might be right, the inconsistency was well around. But it still was a good show. I always perceived her as a more "indecisive" captain. Or one being able to change her opinions. Whatever. It's what it is. The best female captain we had so far 😊

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It brings me no joy to say this, but TNG isn’t “modern Trek” anymore.

[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why not? It's only 10 years old or so?

[–] orb360@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It aired from 87 to 94... So it's 30-40 years old...

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Burn the witch

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I believe that was a version of the old "90s were only 10 or so years ago" joke.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The first two seasons of TNG are balls.

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not quite as terrible as their reputation. Yeah, they've definitely got some of the worst episodes of Trek ever, but there are good ones in there, too.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Oddly, the worst two episodes of Trek are in s7, just before the finale, which is one of the best episodes ever.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

I agree but still good Trek compared to Discovery and Picard.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

S1 TNG is infamously jank.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

I'm rewatching TNG and season 1 was pretty.... Off. Most of the characters seemed to be cheap knockoffs of their established personas. The most distinctive for me was Brent Spiner (Data), where, I can't put my finger on it, but he just seemed off the the data that I know and love.

I chalk it up to him coming off of being a comedic bit actor and he was still finding himself for the more dramatic role of data. He hadn't really nailed down the robotic methodology of his actions and speech that really makes data stand out. His responses were often quick, to the point of speaking over others, and his actions were fairly fluid and organic, which isn't Data at all.

It really didn't take long for him to work his way into the role (and into our hearts), I'm not criticising Brent by any stretch. He was and I'm sure still is, an incredible actor.... Judging by his fairly recent role reprising Data on Picard, he really hasn't lost his touch.

There's plenty of other things about season one that are odd, but I found Data to be the most notable. Still, worf was a lot more brooding, Picard seemed almost more timid, Riker didn't have a beard.... The only person from season one who I can point to with certainty and say that they didn't seem off from season 1 (compared to how I know the character), was Dr. Crusher. She was hitting it out of the park from day 1.

No matter the oddity, almost all of it was simply gone by the end of season one. I'm partway into season two now and I wouldn't be able to differentiate the characters on screen from any other season of the show, or from their movies.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I reckon Voyager was the best of the star treks

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So you've never seen DS9, then.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Or ToS, or TNG.