this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
219 points (97.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
3164 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
219
Researchers discover thousands of nanoplastic bits in bottles of drinking water (www.latimes.com)
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It seems anywhere scientists look for plastic, they find it: from the ice in Antarctica, to the first bowel movement produced by newborn babies.

Now, researchers are finding that the amount of microscopic plastics floating in bottled drinking water is far greater than initially believed.

Using sophisticated imaging technology, scientists at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty laboratory examined water samples from three popular brands (they won’t say which ones) and found hundreds of thousands of bits of plastic per liter of water.

Ninety percent of those plastics were small enough to qualify as nanoplastics: microscopic flecks so small that they can be absorbed into human cells and tissue, as well as cross the blood-brain barrier.

The research, which was published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, raises new concerns about the potentially harmful health effects — and prevalence — of nanoplastics. The researchers found that the quantity of such particles was 10 to 100 times greater than previously estimated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 36 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Honest question, hopefully for someone who knows the science: is the entire population actually being poisoned by oils and plastics, or is this sensationalized? Why has it taken so long to discover? Can it be reversed? Shits crazy

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

We don't know just how bad it is. We have every reason to believe we will find out that it causes cancer, hormonal problems, whatever else you can imagine. Limited studies show that certain plastics cause certain health problems... probably.

But as of now there is no smoking gun evidence. Until there is, we are just going to continue to use it and hope that it is inert. I don't know about you, but I don't feel particularly lucky...

Here is what AI has to say...

"There is no definitive evidence that plastic is bad for our health, but there is growing concern that plastic may pose various health risks at different stages of its life cycle. According to a report by the Center for International Environmental Law², plastic and its impact on human health is poorly understood, but research to date has found that plastic can cause or contribute to:

  • Cancers, lung disease, and birth defects from the extraction and transport of fossil fuels used to make plastic³.
  • Metabolic disorders, reduced fertility, and hormone disruption from the chemicals added to plastic or leached from plastic into food and beverages¹.
  • Respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer from the toxic emissions and ash produced by burning or incinerating plastic waste².
  • Inflammation, tissue damage, and potential transfer of pollutants from the ingestion or inhalation of microplastics in the environment².

These health impacts are not only affecting humans, but also wildlife and ecosystems that are exposed to plastic pollution. Plastic is everywhere, and it is not going away anytime soon. Therefore, it is important to take action to reduce plastic production, consumption, and disposal, and to support more research on the health effects of plastic. 🌎

Source: Conversation with Bing, 1/8/2024 (1) Plastic & Health - Center for International Environmental Law. https://www.ciel.org/plasticandhealth/. (2) Plastics cause wide-ranging health issues from cancer to birth defects .... https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/mar/29/plastics-cause-wide-ranging-health-issues-from-cancer-to-birth-defects-landmark-study-finds. (3) Is plastic a threat to your health? - Harvard Health. https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/is-plastic-a-threat-to-your-health. (4) Plastics and Human Health - Geneva Environment Network. https://www.genevaenvironmentnetwork.org/resources/updates/plastics-and-health/. "

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That report from CIEL is damning, wow. Well, here's to hoping that all works out well for the future... I think the effects scientists are seeing in rats is a decent indication of what we'll see, and seeing the spread of plastic classified and broken down - it's basically become unavoidable for people, and ultimately we're all ingesting more and more petroleum over time, with seemingly fuck all we can do about it I'm pretty uncomfortable right now.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well sperm counts have been halved for some reason. 🤷‍♀️

[–] papertowels@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago

MUST BE THE LIBRUL AGENDA

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A big part of why it is not being taken super seriously is because at our current technology, it would be incredibly expensive to completely remove the microplastics, pharmaceuticals, and other substances in our water supply.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

incredibly expensive

I think you misspelled "almost physically impossible."

How are we getting this stuff out of our lungs, for example?

We're not, is the answer.

[–] Nuerion@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

he said water supply not human body why dont you read a little more

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If your only concern is the water supply, you're missing the bigger picture with microplastics.

They've found them at the bottom of the Marianas trench.

They've found them in rain-water.

Many plastic nano-particles are able to be blown around by air like dust.

They've been found in fucking blood.

The point is it's everywhere, and the person who originally asked the question didn't limit the answer to "the water supply."

Attitudes like yours is why it will get worse because you're arguing dumb chucklefuck shit instead of paying attention to how bad it actually is.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

  1. Yes we are being poisoned no it is not sensationalized. If anything it is underplayed.

  2. Dunno, probably money.

  3. Probably not. Sorry.