this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
1015 points (98.0% liked)

News

22890 readers
4485 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In an interview with the Guardian from his home base in Burlington, Vermont, Sanders urged the Democratic president to inject more urgency into his bid for re-election. He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

“We’ve got to see the White House move more aggressively on healthcare, on housing, on tax reform, on the high cost of prescription drugs,” Sanders said. “If we can get the president to move in that direction, he will win; if not, he’s going to lose.”

The US senator from Vermont added that he was in contact with the White House pressing that point. “We hope to make clear to the president and his team that they are not going to win this election unless they come up with a progressive agenda that speaks to the needs of the working class of this country.”

Sanders’ warning comes at a critical time in American politics. On Monday, Republicans in Iowa will gather for caucuses that mark the official start of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden faces no serious challenger in the Democratic primaries. But concern is mounting over how he would fare against Trump given a likely rematch between them in November.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spider@lemmy.nz 43 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Trump's cultist ass should be getting crushed.

Makes me wonder what might have happened if the DNC hadn't f**ked Bernie over, twice.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, the DNC f-ing unknowingly gave that blowhard dictator his platform.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Unknowingly? They would rather have Trump than Bernie ruining their two party corruption. The DNC won in 2016.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 8 months ago

Very explicitly knowingly *

*FTFY.

Democrats will suspend the constitution THEMSELVES before they go against our corporate overlords and run someone like Bernie.

[–] metalsonic00@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They didnt care. DNC would rather lose with Hillary/Biden then win with Bernie.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago

The DNC loves losing. Losing means they can endlessly fundraise and not have to actually govern!

[–] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It hurts me to think how much better a position we would be in right now if they hadn't worked so hard to marginalize him.

Imagine how many lives would have been saved on just the pandemic disinformation alone.

And Bernie would have absolutely demolished cheetolini in the debates.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I still remember trying to explain to someone back in my reddit days that many media sources played clips of people saying they are voting for Biden in the primaries because they believe Bernie would lose. The only places saying that were the same media sources.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which is why I am a very vocal advocate for eating the rich. They can own all they want inside my belly.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] spider@lemmy.nz 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Our unofficial forum namesake! :)

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Rich people would be getting richer slower and the world would be a better place.

[–] oce@jlai.lu -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe he would have lost his aura because he wouldn't have had the means to do what he says should be done.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe he would have lost his aura

At this point Bernie's lost at least some of it; I can't disagree with those who've accused him of sheepdogging, although I think he was trying to do the best he could with what he had.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Sanders not burning his own party cost him much of his clout. Frankly they deserved it for what they did to him and his show of weakness backing the warhawk Clinton was awful to see from someone who usually has so much fire.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bernie's moral code includes supporting his party's "democratic" ways, as anything else would be a coup in its own right.

Even if I believe he's off the mark in doing that, I admire him for it. It's rare to see these days.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Admirable? Blind slavery to a corrupt system? I fail to see what is admirable about not trying to fix a country but instead keeping corruption alive.

[–] xhieron@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What alternative would you propose? Say what you will about Sanders, but he actually wants the Republic to last, imperfect though it may be. Apparently many of his critics prefer a politician who will throw a tantrum if things don't go his way and then try to bring down the whole nation. That reminds me of someone else.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

What a brave man supporting genocide and imperialism. The empire must last a 1000 years and nobody should ever try to change it.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 1 points 8 months ago

Sanders not burning his own party cost him much of his clout.

Technically it's not his own party since he's an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, but otherwise I know exactly what you mean.