-6
US Senators Urge Biden to Retaliate with Direct Strike on Iran over Military Deaths in Jordan
(www.jewishpress.com)
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
-6 points (40.0% liked)
News
22890 readers
4520 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ah yes, the well-known, reliable, unbiased source known as jewishpress.com.
Really? How many Peabody awards has it won? Because Al Jazeera has won four.
You said this source is "Far better than AlJazeera that gets posted here."
I just showed you that Al Jazeera has won one of the world's top journalism awards four times. What are the accolades jewishpress.com have gotten? Because this post was literally the first time I had ever heard of them. You clearly know about them, so please do tell me about their journalistic bona fides.
It's odd that you care so much about Al Jazeera's ownership and biases but have said nothing about jewishpress.com's ownership and biases. Are they bias-free and owned by an unimpeachable company? Do tell me since you must know.
From whom? Let's see these ratings and compare them.
Once again, you seem totally uninterested in jewishpress.com's possible bias. Why is that?
You didn't say anything about inaccuracies. You said bias:
Also, Media Bias Fact Check does not say Jewish Press is "much less" than Al Jazeera when it comes to bias. In fact, their bias levels are about equal.
Did you not actually think I would check?
What you said:
Then you directed me to a website which said they have the same amount of bias.
So either you didn't think I would check or you didn't check.
The source you told me to look at says they have the same amount of bias. This seems to be a "what are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?" situation.
You said one was more biased than the other. You have yet to show that is the case.
That still doesn't show that it is more biased than the other source. That just shows that it has a bias, something no one has denied.
We can not assume any such thing.
You made multiple statements saying it was more biased as if it were a fact. You also said that site would prove that it is more biased.
Now you are admitting it doesn't prove it. I gave you plenty of chances and you kept moving the goalposts and pretending you didn't say something when I even copied and pasted you saying it.
So you've been dishonest this entire time.
I don't think we need to continue this conversation. I'm not interested in talking to people who construct elaborate but obvious lies.
I'm Jewish, genius.
Goodbye.
How do you think they got this story wrong?
Because it's not hard to verify that some US Senators really are calling for strikes on Iran.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-hawks-call-for-retaliation-after-3-killed-in-iranian-backed-strike/ar-BB1honlS
US Senators regularly call for strikes on Iran.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-jewish-press/
Ah yes, the well-known, reliable, unbiased source known as mediabiasfactcheck.com
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1751657471280652397
So a typical Sunday for Lindsay?
Lol is his lying ass ready to go to war?
No. But he's ready to fight till the last drop of everyone else's blood.