this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
36 points (70.9% liked)

science

14779 readers
31 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Two Cambridge-led studies suggest that the psychological distress caused by lockdowns (UK) and experience of infection (US) was reduced among those of faith compared to non-religious people.

People of religious faith may have experienced lower levels of unhappiness and stress than secular people during the UK’s Covid-19 lockdowns in 2020 and 2021, according to a new University of Cambridge study released as a working paper.

The findings follow recently published Cambridge-led research suggesting that worsening mental health after experiencing Covid infection – either personally or in those close to you – was also somewhat ameliorated by religious belief. This study looked at the US population during early 2021.

University of Cambridge economists argue that – taken together – these studies show that religion may act as a bulwark against increased distress and reduced wellbeing during times of crisis, such as a global public health emergency.

“Selection biases make the wellbeing effects of religion difficult to study,” said Prof Shaun Larcom from Cambridge’s Department of Land Economy, and co-author of the latest study. “People may become religious due to family backgrounds, innate traits, or to cope with new or existing struggles.”

“However, the Covid-19 pandemic was an extraordinary event affecting everyone at around the same time, so we could gauge the impact of a negative shock to wellbeing right across society. This provided a unique opportunity to measure whether religion was important for how some people deal with a crisis.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 74 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Did they "cope" with it, or just straight up deny it though?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd be curious to see the same study measuring how many of them died vs the regular population. Being calm in the face of danger ceases to be a good thing when it stems from straight-up ignoring the danger until it kills you.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

Yeah if you interview after the fact there's inherent survivorship bias.

Almost like "not wearing helmets decreases nonfatal head injuries" as the upside down finding of steel helmets leading to more head injuries (instead of death) in WWI.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

I don't know a single religious person who took it seriously. So that's probably why they thought it was fine.