this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
441 points (97.8% liked)

News

23284 readers
4005 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't have kids. No kids ever visit my house. I don't flaunt my gun ownership, nor do I leave them laying about. Why do I need a safe?

[–] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because it’s a deadly weapon and it’s your responsibility that it is secured (not necessarily a safe). Part of responsible gun ownership.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

(not necessarily a safe).

Um. wasn't that kinda my question? I didn't say they were not 'secure'.

[–] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My apologies for the confusion then, though my use of the word “safe” was secure. Keeping a gun hidden in a sock drawer != safe, though there are other ways to secure something.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Sure, i can understand that. I think there are a lot of people here that think guns somehow just up and shoot people on their own. I get what you're saying.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You always supposed to have a safe. You're supposed to keep it in a safe, even if you don't think you need to.

When people talk about irresponsible gun ownership, you're the type of person they're talking about. It's people like you who just don't care. You're not being responsible with your weapon.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What would a safe change in this specific case?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No you're supposed to have a safe. It's got nothing to do with this case it's just about gun safety in general.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

explain to me why? my guns are secure. I have no children. I don't have kids in my life what so ever. they aren't laying around on tables or nightstands. explain why.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Why are you arguing with me I don't make up the law.

You are supposed to have a gun safe, you're supposed to secure your weapons. It's your choice if you don't do it whatever your justification is is irrelevant.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

That is not the "LAW". in some states it might be, but it's not federal law at all.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Why do we need bet our lives on you not lying? Why do we have to tolerate people who leave handguns in cars and secure rifles with threats of domestic violence all so you, a special special snowflake who pinkie promises they're responsible, don't have to buy a safe?

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What would a safe change in this specific case?

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What a plot twist, a pro-gun poster who can't look beyond themselves and what they want and see the wider problems of gun ownership.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Please explain to me how the situation i described would be any different if my guns were in a safe, rather than a locked closet?

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

And surprise surprise, he's slow too.

"I will never drive drunk so what good are DUI laws?"

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

you still haven't answered any questions. just thrown insults.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"No but you don't understand, I'm not driving drunk so how would DUI laws change anything".

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

you're still throwing out strawman arguments.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Have you tried shooting them with your poorly secured firearms?

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

wow. great. much burn. so raw. Still can't answer the question.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh honey, it's been repeatedly answered for you, you've just been too slow to pick up on it.

I hope you're intentionally trying to make me waste my time cause otherwise holy fuck, you sure are unarmed on the internet.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh then be a dear and point out EXACTLY where it's been answered. Cause all I see is snark and avoidance.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nah. It's time for you to learn how to think for yourself rather than having people spoonfeed you information and opinions.

Besides, having you unable to see things right in front of your face makes gun owners look much worse.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

You haven't said a single thing here. you've literally just made fun of me all the while avoiding the question. I don't NEED your "opinion". I know the law and I know where I stand with it. I want you, someone who said I'm wrong, to tell me exactly how I'm wrong, without calling names, or making strawman arguments. You literally have not answered a single question. You're playing everything by the "i know jack shit" playbook. You simply can't tell me the answer to my question. You say I'm wrong but refuse to tell me why. Leads me to believe YOU'RE the one that's been spoon-fed information and you're too dim witted to parse it into something you can put into words yourself.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

how do safe storage laws reduce gun violence?

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What would a safe change in this specific case?

Theft. Any time you aren't home your house turns into an unattended armory for thieves.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

oh right so someone else breaking the law is somehow my fault? got it.

[–] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

So answer me this. If a 'thief' breaks into your LOCKED house, steals your car keys, takes your car and kills someone else in a car accident, are you liable?