this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
168 points (97.7% liked)

News

23311 readers
3682 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Texas man who drugged his wife's drinks in an attempt to induce an abortion was sentenced to 180 days in jail and 10 years on probation.

Mason Herring, a 39-year-old Houston attorney, pleaded guilty Wednesday to injury to a child and assault of a pregnant person. He had initially been charged with felony assault to induce abortion.

Catherine Herring, who has filed for divorce, told the court the jail sentence was not long enough. She said their 1-year-old daughter, their third child, was born about 10 weeks premature, has developmental delays and attends therapy eight times a week.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you shoot someone while robbing them and they live, that's aggravated robbery in Texas.

If they die as a result of those injuries 10 years later, the crime is then upgraded to murder (possibly even capital murder) in Texas.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That’s very interesting and since posting this I’ve been thinking about it, you could probably sue someone in civil court for this kind of thing.

But a fetus is not a human.

I’m not a lawyer or a judge, but a fetus is not a human.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, I won't disagree on your definitions. But the charge of "Injury to a Child" is still appropriate here. A child was eventually injured as a result of an assault.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Now that would be a matter of the law. I don’t know if you can be accused of assaulting someone before they were a human. At the time of the crime, no child was injured.

I think the pregnant person was assaulted and the penalty was possibly way to low, but saying that a child was injured is incorrect. I don’t have the answer, but it seems like the mother should be compensated somehow for her assault, enough even to possibly help with the eventual child that was born. But a fetus is not a human is my main point.

I’m sure there is a moral solution to this, but claiming that fetus’ are humans is not that solution.

Edit: I would even argue we could penalize people for assaulting a fetus if that that is what we wanted to do. But calling a fetus a child is just plain incorrect.

Edit: I take that back. Assaulting a fetus is not a thing. Full stop. Assaulting a pregnant person is.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I do have the answer. In Texas, injuring a pregnant woman that results in injury to the child that is eventually born is called "Injury to a Child".

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not a child.

(I edited my comment above to answer this)

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A child was born. That child is injured.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think we are in disagreement that there should be some form of compensation for the mother to help with the care of her child. What I am arguing is that a fetus is not a human.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I am not disagreeing with you on the definition of the word "fetus". A fetus is not a child. We agree. Good. Next topic: appropriate charges in the case being discussed...

I am letting you know what Texas Penal Code and case law in Texas indicate are appropriate charges when a pregnant woman is assaulted and then gives birth to a child who has an injury that resulted from the assault. The child is a complainant in a charge called "Injury to a Child".

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Texas is wrong in a lot of ways. This seems like a way for them to codify fetus’ into law as being humans, which is not correct. I’m saying no child was injured and the law doesn’t make any sense.

Edit: and if this is an example of injury to a child how did this guy get off on that charge?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So the child who clearly has an injury right now is not a child? Or are they not currently injured?

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Anyway I hope you’re doing well today.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I am well. Thank you. The sentiment is reciprocated.