this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
814 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
2622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Elon Musk purchased shares of Twitter after unsuccessfully petitioning the CEO to remove a Twitter account tracking his private jet.
  • Musk's personal gripes played a key role in his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter.
  • Musk banned the account after promising not to, highlighting his prioritization of getting his way over free speech.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/ttBv9

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 178 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Holy shit this dude fucking lives on his plane. Like I feel guilty about the 2-3x per year I fly to see family but this fucker has flown that far already in the past week. Why? Does he not know how to do a video call?

[–] PureTryOut@lemmy.kde.social 147 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Ugh, I feel the same. I know the top 1% of the world or whatever emits tons and tons more CO2 per year than the other 99%, but I didn't know it was this bad. That plane is flying multiple times per day. Sure Musk is probably not in it all the time, but that doesn't matter.

Private jets should be banned all together, let's see how quickly they suddenly find out the internet exists.

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 74 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Things like this are perfect reminders that we don't have to change every person on the planet, just eliminate the erronneous emissions.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Eliminate the erroneous emissions. Interesting take on the ol' "eat the rich." I like it!

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All air travel should have fuel and emissions tax. Normalize them to commercial airliners. That'll incentivize larger, more efficient plane designs. It'll also punish private jets. Also charge a fee for any planes not at least X% full. Also give discounts and waive fees for planes over X size that service under-served airports.

A bunch of regulations like this should make private planes prohibitively expensive, like 10-20x their current cost. But that's a lot of legislation that huge corporations and billionaires would oppose.

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Planes are already pretty fuel efficient per passenger. And larger planes are unlikely, because this would mean all runways they want to use must be extended so the can start and land there.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Commercial planes with high occupancy got somewhat efficient (until you compare to other modes of transportation), but private jets with 1 ego on board are incredibly fuel inefficient.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s a very big ego though, so of course it needs a lot of fuel.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

how much fuel would it take to burn the ego to the ground?

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Carbon emissions per km:-

  • Domestic flight: 240 g

  • Eurostar (train): 4 g

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-footprint-travel-mode

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's domestic flights in the UK which are stupidly short. Short and long haul flights are at 150g which is already less than ICE cars at ~170 and not far above the average bus at 100g. Though obviously no where near electrified rail.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Planes are already pretty fuel efficient per passenger

Eh.... They're similar to cars for a similar distance. But, that still means gobs of CO2 emitted if you're traveling from NY to LA, which would be a massive trip in a car.

[–] TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

And if only manufactures would make use of hydrogen turbojets.

[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People with private jets often charter them out when they’re not using them. The best place for an airplane is in the air. Only bad things happen when you let it sit around on the ground all the time. It’s not much different than commercial planes that spend most of their time in the air.

Sure, a private jet will have more emissions than an Airbus, but it’s a marginal increase. It’s not like rich people with their planes are producing a million times more pollution that wouldn’t exist if they didn’t have a private jet. They’re still going to fly, at least for longer trips.

It’s easy to go down a rabbit hole with this line of reasoning. Who else is using less efficient aircraft or taking unnecessary flights? Are all those police helicopter flights necessary? What about people flying to go party on an island somewhere versus some more noble purpose? Or airlines with a half empty flight? Meanwhile, it’s the oil companies producing the vast majority of carbon emissions while we squabble over travel itineraries and choice of aircraft.

[–] Lilith_the_serpent@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

If elon didn't have a private jet and had to travel in a regular passenger plane, it would aboulutely make a difference I'm carbon emissions. Right now, we are seeing emissions from passenger planes AND private jets. Take away private jets and the passenger planes will still create the same emissions regardless. Your argument is that the addition of private jets are a "marginal increase" of emissions.

That makes no sense. Less planes = less emissions. Private jets + planes = more emissions. Just like, if most people took public transportation on the road. Busses + cars = more emissions than if there were no cars and only public transportation left. There would be less emissions if the wealthy traveled in a regular passenger plane like everyone else.

It's easy to go down a rabbit hole with that kind of reasoning.

The point is that one plane can transport a large amount of passengers in one trip, compared to, transporting the same amount of passengers in a private jet would take multiple trips. Transport more people with less fuel use. This is why public transportation is so important. It actually does make a difference. Elon just likes his toys and doesn't give a shit about the effect it has on the environment. That's why he's so focused on Mars.

This planet is doomed because of people like him, and he knows it. Otherwise, he would be investing his money into making the earth a better place instead of investing in trying to leave it.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You shouldn't really feel guilty about anything like that. Asking hundreds of millions to billions of people to drastically change their lives and practice austerity is insane while billionaires do whatever they want and corporations push legislation that makes it harder to conserve. Our meager efforts won't matter much if the biggest offenders go pollute wantonly.

Individual's biggest efforts are pushing for legislation and politicians who will curb corporate abuses. Everything is a drop in a bucket that's already overflowing.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

That's why capitalism is inherently incompatible with stopping Climate Change and we’re all fucked.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Others close to him use the jet as well, but I imagine it's still heavily Elon

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also, many of the flights are empty. The flight will be moved so it's in position if needed, or it will drop him off and fly elsewhere.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That seems wasteful, of any flight really.

It'd be cool if jets doing that could partner with freight companies and move cargo if needing to reposition.

Uber for flight cargo

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Every private jet flight is wasteful. But, Elon Musk's wealth fluctuates by up to $5 billion every single day. Even if he spent $5m a day on his jet, it would be an amount he wouldn't even notice. He could literally buy a brand new private jet every single day and not notice the cost.

[–] anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Dude takes a 22 minute flight. My god how small do you need to feel to boost your ego to do that instead of video.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

10 minute flight for nearly 1 ton of CO2 emissions 2 days ago.

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This follows classic maritime law: You don't have to pay taxes if you live in the air. That is what my lawyer Chareth Cutestory said. I have the best lawyers

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago

Do your bosses (and their bosses) support work-from-home? They know how, but it's about control for these people.