this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
94 points (98.0% liked)

xkcd

8843 readers
289 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tl:dw Hubble is designed to look at objects really far away and isn't calibrated for Earth or fast enough to track a single spot long enough for good exposure, so the earth would be blurry.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Now, if we had the ability to focus at earth distance with proper stabilization, what would we see?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yes but to what degree of magnification? Would we see a city, a street, a car, a person…?

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I did some napkin math and came to about 3.5 miles of field of view of pointed at the earth.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hubble is old enough that it only has a 1MP camera, so roughly 720p or 1280x720 pixels , so each pixel would represent about 15 feet if you're generous. A back yard swimming pool would be like 4 pixels, 9 if your parents are rich.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

This is a much better way of looking at it! Thanks!

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Apparently you spinning in a chair if you have a skylight over it