this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
244 points (98.4% liked)

News

23320 readers
3056 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Illinois is the first state in the U.S. to ensure child social media influencers are compensated for their work, according to Sen. David Koehler, of Peoria, who sponsored a bill that was signed into law and will go into effect on July 1, 2024.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How would you accomplish that if you were in charge?

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ToS that enforces 16+ to post content of themselves as the main focus of their channel. Definitely not require any sort of ID. If they're proven to be lying, or are clearly and visibly under 16, then ban.

[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay the age part doesn’t seem pragmatic at all since aging a kid based on only appearances is wildly inconsistent, and now you’ve banned someone so they just make another account.

What do you do now?

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m sorry, I’m confused. I asked how someone who wanted to ban child influencers would accomplish that, and you gave a small list of things you would do to do it, and then when it didn’t work you said that was the whole point?

Is your point that you can’t do it? And if so, why did you offer up something if you figured it wouldn’t even work?

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

If they're ban evading, they're just going to keep getting rebanned and isn't an influencer at that point. Appearances is a difficult problem, and unless it's very obvious they're under 16, they shouldn't be banned. The alternative is that you ask for IDs to guarantee this, which is horrible. It'd be much more preferable to let this small problem run rampant, since it's significantly less harmful then requiring IDs which I hope I don't need to explain why that's extremely bad, privacy invasive, and a security nightmare.

[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 2 points 1 year ago

Why is this so upvoted?

It accomplishes nothing and would do nothing to “ban child influencers”.

The entire point of the thought experiment was to point out how ridiculous the idea of somehow banning people off social media completely is.

Any and all terms or conditions would be wholly unenforceable.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would like say ID they are 18 if they want to monetize but It can't be that easy especially at a global level.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Most countries have birth certs and national ID of some sort. Not that hard.