Not The Onion

12272 readers

1430 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

129

Scientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed article (arstechnica.com)

submitted 9 months ago by livus@kbin.social to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they just recently showed that a huge amount of scientific articles are just that, gibberish. Nonsensical scientific mumbo-jumbo wrapped up within a thin veneer of credibility. Scientific authors will pay for these in order to strengthen their resume.

I kinda wonder why they don't just skip a step, and just put fake stuff directly on the resume, but hey, they're the scientists

[–] livus@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

@jpreston2005 resumes are digital these days and you link to the DOI of your paper so recruiters and funders can check with one click.