this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
1106 points (97.6% liked)

News

23259 readers
4576 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oliver made the proposal on Sunday’s episode of his HBO show Last Week Tonight, saying the supreme court justice had 30 days to accept or it would expire.

The British-born comedian’s offer came after a steady drumbeat of media investigations in the previous several months established that Thomas failed to disclose that political benefactors bought him lavish vacation travel and real estate for his mother. Thomas also failed to disclose – as required – that he allowed school fees for a family member to be paid off and had been provided a loan to buy a luxury motor coach, all after openly complaining about the need to raise supreme court justices’ salaries.

As a result, Thomas’s impartiality came into question after he sided with the contentious ruling that eliminated the federal abortion rights once provided by the Roe v Wade case.

He also recently listened to arguments over whether Donald Trump can be removed from states’ ballots in the presidential election after the former president’s supporters – whom he told to “fight like hell” – staged the January 6 attack at the US Capitol in Washington DC. Thomas resisted pressure to recuse himself from such matters, even though his wife, Ginni Thomas, is a conservative political activist who has endorsed false claims from Trump and his supporters that the 2020 election he lost to Joe Biden was stolen from him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 295 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Associate Supreme Court Justice annual salary: $285,400

So if he turns it down, he either really likes being a judge (he doesn't act like it) or he's got a financial incentive beyond his salary to stay.

And I'm guessing he'll turn it down.

[–] Atom@lemmy.world 119 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

We're stuck with him till 2034 at least, he had this to say following his confirmation:

"The liberals made my life miserable for 43 years," a former clerk renmembered Thomas who was 43 years old when confirmed saying, according to The New York Times. "And I'm going to make their lives miserable for 43 years."

https://www.businessinsider.com/clarence-thomas-told-clerks-he-wants-to-make-liberals-miserable-2022-6?amp

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 103 points 8 months ago

Yes, but he also lies all the time, so I wouldn't exactly take than on face value.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 61 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what ways he thinks liberals made his life miserable. Honestly sounds like this idiot doesn’t even know what the word ‘liberal’ means.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 38 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

He didn't like people thinking he got into law school etc because he was black. He fervently hates affirmative action.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He hates it because he's literally one of the people whom affirmative action helped put him in a position he is totally unqualified for (Supreme Court Justice).

His evidence that it is bad and doesn't work is... himself.

What was that thing about conservatives and projection.... Oh yeah: "It's always projection."

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What's funny is the only people who think he got in that way are conservatives lol.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Maybe initially only conservatives thought that, but as a not-conservative I've got to admit that the way he's been acting is making a more and more compelling case for it.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 56 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I dunno. Oliver has guaranteed him a cool $1mil per year, until either Thomas or John dies (out of his own pocket no less!!), AND thrown in a brand new, top of the line Prevost Marathon motor coach.

It's a mouth-watering deal.

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 59 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Which he will turn down. If you watch the episode you'll see all the perks he enjoys from being who he is. Which of course he'd stop being invited to, if he retired from the position.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

True (and I watched the episode), but it doesn't take away from the fact it is a sweet deal. I bet you Thomas considers it, even if he chooses not to take it.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It was scary seeing the stark difference between when he was begging his legislative colleagues that they need to raise their pay and his more recent interviews about how they are paid.

It's clear as day that even though he isn't getting paid more, he's getting paid plenty.

The funny thing was that I almost couldn't get a security clearance because I had so much debt in my early career days. The fact that there is zero oversight over the Supreme Court is just baffling.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

Yup.

Rules for thee, not for me. Maybe that should become part of the swearing in oath so they can be honest at least once.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Conservatives would counter 10M to stay on the court and consider it a deal.

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

At least it would make the point of whomever pays more gets to own the judges completely moot.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Third option: he turns it down because he likes STIGGINIT too much.

What's funny is, NPR did an interview with a guy who wrote a book on Thomas, and one of the things he points out is how much Thomas hates affirmative action because of a deep-seated insecurity about his own accomplishments.

Which becomes the ultimate irony: the only reason Thomas is on SCOTUS is because Republicans wanted a black man to replace Thurgood Marshall, but without all the pesky "morals" and "ethics." In other words, he obtained the pinnacle of his career... Because of his skin color.

No wonder he hates himself.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

I truly believe Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks is the best portrayal of Thomas anyone has done.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 41 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Even if he decided it was a good deal, if he cares about the legacy of his past decisions at least seeming legitimate, he has to turn it down. We all know he’s for sale, but he loses deniability if he straight up sells out.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

if he was concerned with anything he's done seeming legitimate, He probably wouldnt have taken all the bribes and shit that we know of thus far.

[–] Waldowal@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Should have offered 100 million. You're right. He won't sell out his legacy for a million, but I bet he would for 100.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 months ago

He already sold out his legacy ffs

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

He sold his "legacy" for a luxury fishing trip.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

That was Alito. Thomas sold his legacy for a bus.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

I mean, fishing can be a really great time.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

Somehow I don't think John Oliver can quite afford to straight up offer someone 100 million dollars.

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But this is the thing that's dangerous about this otherwise hilarious premise.

If you can pay judges to leave so you can stack the court with your people... The court is even more fucked.

[–] Grilipper54@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have a good feeling it's also illegal. How is this not a bribe to a political figure?

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I'd guess the shows lawyers looked into this.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] nomous@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Don't even need to sell yourself to foreign actors. There's plenty of cash floating around the Microsofts, Eli Lillys, Berkshire Hathaways, Proctor & Gambles, et al.

You can take all the "lobbying" you want and remain a Faithful Patriotic American^tm^

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And you think that’s all the money he’s getting?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

That was my point. Turning it down either means he just loves judging so much that he's willing to do it until he dies or he has a financial incentive worth more than a million dollars a year.