this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
120 points (79.7% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3207 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Data from thousands of EVs shows the average daily driving distance is a small percentage of the EPA range of most EVs.

For years, range anxiety has been a major barrier to wider EV adoption in the U.S. It's a common fear: imagine being in the middle of nowhere, with 5% juice remaining in your battery, and nowhere to charge. A nightmare nobody ever wants to experience, right? But a new study proves that in the real world, that's a highly improbable scenario.

After analyzing information from 18,000 EVs across all 50 U.S. states, battery health and data start-up Recurrent found something we sort of knew but took for granted. The average distance Americans cover daily constitutes only a small percentage of what EVs are capable of covering thanks to modern-day battery and powertrain systems.

The study revealed that depending on the state, the average daily driving distance for EVs was between 20 and 45 miles, consuming only 8 to 16% of a battery’s EPA-rated range. Most EVs on sale today in the U.S. offer around 250 miles of range, and many models are capable of covering over 300 miles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why you're being down voted. Rental cars exist and can be a better option that spewing emissions 360 days/year just so your can take your one long vacation, that isn't really even that long...

Realistically though, a 200 mi trip, even if op lives in Alaska, is going to be at most 1 stop, and only if it's really really cold.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's like people who own a pickup truck only so they can tow a boat once or twice a year. It's unnecessary.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How about they have a pickup to tow a boat any time they want during the season, and also be able to get firewood, mulch or a Christmas tree?

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just tossed 1/8 cord of firewood in the back of my EV6, and it's pretty easy/common to toss a tree on the roof of a car. How often are you getting mulch?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

So 3 big hauls a year? 2 of which could probably be done with most mid-size or larger cars, and one that could be handled with a $20 home Depot pickup rental annually? You're probably spending quite a bit more in gas than you're "saving" by not just renting a pickup for those 1-3 needs annually.