this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
220 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
3048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
220
Judge rebukes law firm using ChatGPT to justify $113,484.62 fee as “utterly and unusually unpersuasive” (www.theregister.com)
submitted 8 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Judge rebukes law firm using ChatGPT to justify $113,484.62 fee as “utterly and unusually unpersuasive”::Use of AI to calculate legal bill 'utterly and unusually unpersuasive'

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think what you needed was something of an inverse problem solution, for some calculations it may be quite hard to compute. Were you successful in finding the starting value without ChatGPT's help?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 8 months ago

I can't remember! It was probably a year ago, but knowing me I probably tried random starting numbers until I got the answer I wanted.