News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
The liberal Christians?
Yep. Not only do they worship someone who they claim is the font of wisdom but never said a thing about rape or slavery, they also have a follow-up writer who hates women and gay people and a prequel book full of horrors.
On top of that, their savior very clearly says that anyone who doesn't worship him goes to hell. John 3:18 if you're curious.
So if by 'liberal Christians' you mean 'Christians who reject their own religious text' then maybe they need a new religion that they actually agree with.
If you don't believe in God why do you care about hell? Christians can worship God and have beliefs that aren't aligned with government policy. You think Christianity is a political party? Christians don't vote (and should not vote) by the Bible. If they did the republican party nor the democratic party would align with their beliefs if they held them true to the bible. You don't need to reject biblical text when you vote for either party. But you do reject biblical text when you vote for the sake of "owning" or any form of despising another human.
Jesus was pretty specific to give unto the governments of the world what they demand. Christians aren't to create a Christian nation on earth, because the political body of christ (the temple) is not the physical land of a nation, but the heart of the people living in any nation.
I'm talking about their archaic and backward beliefs, not what I care about.
Yes. He was also pretty specific about anyone not believing in him deserving eternal torture. And he totally lacked specificity when it came to things like slavery and rape- but took the time to talk about why divorce was bad. Why would you venerate such a person?
Christ didn't come to change social or economic structure. His teachings were aimed at the orientation of the heart and soul. His stance on how you treat slaves as well as how you are to serve are clear on where your heart should be, while not speaking of current social or economical structures.
I'm not here to argue or defend Christ. I made my comment just to say Christianity and many religions are not strictly aligned to conservatism as it comes in political parties.
I never said anything about political parties.
I said religion is conservative and right-wing. Christianity included. Because Christianity holds on to antiquated morals about slavery, equality, sex, etc.
As for this-
How you treat slaves is free them. Weird how Jesus never suggested as much. Also weird how you seem to be excusing slavery as long as slaves are treated well.
There is one single acceptable moral stance on slavery in today's world and Jesus, despite being venerated by Christians as the source of morality, didn't adopt that stance. Because religion is conservative and right-wing even if its adherents don't like it or understand that.
You're literally arguing right wingism and stances as it comes to governing.
And don't twist this around to saying Christians are OK with slavery. Jesus also said to render unto Ceasar your heavy taxes in a Roman empire where the wealth disparity and poverty was crippling. This doesn't mean Jesus approved of gouging and wealth hoarding. He consistently taught to be the servant and to give. Not to own slaves own lucrative businesses. And before you bring up Paul's letters to the ephesians again this is about where you are in your societal structure not changing, but orient your heart.
These were structural issues that again Jesus did not come to fix. The messiah that was hoped for was one like Macabee that frees the jews from Greek rule. This wasn't the case to be freed from Roman rule. Jews have been freed and enslaved for many generations. Isaiah's messiah was not one of physical world freedom, but one of the freedom in your spirit. And if you're missing that then you're missing the entirety of what it means to be a Christian.
Jesus was okay with slavery.
So if Christians are against it, they are not against it for the reasons what they consider to be the source of all morality taught.
Again, Jesus preached against divorce, but not slavery or rape.
"Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery." From Matthew 19.
So apparently he did come to fix the structural issues of divorce and "sexual immorality." Just not the structural issue of slavery or rape.
By the way, the idea of sexual immorality? Also right-wing and conservative. And came right out of Jesus' own mouth.
Jesus was most definitely not ok with slavery the way you're portraying it. There's nuance in history you're completely ignoring.
Divorce is an issue of the heart. And Jesus taught that man and women that come together should not split. It's not farfetched to believe it good when people who come together stay together. Earlier in Matthew 5 he speaks of gouging out your eye that makes you sin, or your hand. Not because he expects you to commit amputation on yourself, but to clarify the severity of sinful decisions that he took upon himself.
And yeah, sexual immorality. 2000 years ago and today we still have views of sexual immorality. You don't think cheating is moral do you?
Anyways. This can go back and forth for a while. I don't like arguing on the internet. Especially outside of healthy discussions.
He sure seemed to be.
Ah, he was okay with the good kind of slavery. Gotcha.
I don't think it's anyone's business. But religion makes it their business. Because, again, it is conservative and right-wing.