this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
318 points (98.2% liked)

News

23161 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Nebraska woman allegedly found a lucrative quirk at a gas station pump — double-swipe the rewards card and get free gas!

Unfortunately for her, you can’t do that, prosecutors said. The 45-year-old woman was arrested March 6 and faces felony theft charges accusing her of a crime that cost the gas station nearly $28,000.

Prosecutors say the woman exploited the system over a period of several months. Police learned of the problem in October when the loss-prevention manager at Bosselman Enterprises reported that the company’s Pump & Pantry in Lincoln had been scammed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's different in that they gave her a card that says "here is a discount".

If you go into a store, pay with a stack of coupons from that store and walk out with a free chicken, can the store come back and charge you with a felony because they made a mistake and claim they didn't really mean to print the coupon?

How far can this go? Buy a car on sale and then get arrested for not paying the full price afterwards? "The customer should have known the deal was too good."

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Swiping the card twice puts the machine into maintenance mode where she manually adjusted the price to zero. That's pretty straightforward theft.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you’re putting maintenance mode behind 2 normal swipes I don’t understand how that isn’t your fault

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

TIL: If the lock is easy enough to pick, you can legally break in and take whatever you want. /s

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Not saying it isn’t theft. Just pointing out the fact that putting maintenance mode behind 2 swipes (as if no one’s ever had to re-swipe a card before) is as stupid as using an easy to pick lock on whatever you want to protect. I dont slam lock my door everyday, I add an extra factor of protection by using more than just slam lock.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So was selling toxic assets to pension funds

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

We get it and all agree that rich people should also be held accountable for their crimes. You don't need to convince anyone here.

The difference between you and those of us not defending her is that only one of us is defending exploiting a fault in the system for personal benefit.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ia your entire argument here that because the ultra-rich get away with financial crimes that everyone should be allowed to commit them?

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

My entire argument is that we have misplaced priorities. In my lifetime the airlines got two bailouts, the auto industry got two bailouts, the banks got 3 bailouts, and a whole fuckton of fake GOP connected companies got Covid money.

We are talking about a trillion fucking dollars if you add it all up and adjust for inflation. A trillion fucking dollars stolen from us. That is the priority, not someone who got a discount on gasoline by using a rewards card.

When I see everyone C level at Bane Capital, Haliburton, American Airlines, Goldman, GM, and those that worked at Sterns behind bars then I will worry about this lady. The law should bind those at the top more than those at the bottom.

You can also arrest Thomas and Alito while you are at it for taking bribes.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

If she went to a gas station one time and swiped her card and it gave her free gas, it's reasonable to think that she might have assumed the discount gave her free gas on the first use. This wouldn't be an issue.

When she's using it to get over $20,000 in gas, selling gas to others by using her double swipe technique, that falls well outside the reasonable bounds of an honest mistake.

So no, there is no slippery slope where you're going to be locked up for a store misapplying a coupon or whatever.