105
Stargazer’s paradise: Oregon area named world’s largest dark sky sanctuary
(www.theguardian.com)
just science related topics. please contribute
note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry
Rule 1) Be kind.
lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about
I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll
This seems too American exceptionalism-y to be real lol
It's an accreditation and award from Dark Sky International , an Arizona nonprofit organization. So, yeah, they probably aren't running around Siberia with light meters.
Still, I appreciate their efforts. Apparently OR had to make some changes to get the title. Effective, too. I hadn't really thought about the area much. Now, I'd like to go spend some time in the high desert, looking at stars.
Friendly reminder that "nonprofit" doesn't mean it's a charitable and honest corporation. Not saying DSI is bad, just that nonprofits love to bury profits in executive salaries as "cost of operations" while making people picture volunteers doing good.
They do accreditations internationally too, though you're almost certainly right that some locations aren't as represented, especially since it requires communication and cooperation with the governments for these areas.
I agreed, thinking immediately of larger un/sparsely populated regions. While DSI is American and probably biased, this part has something to do with it that would set it apart from some other places:
I'm sure there's some casual ~~bribery~~ suggestive donations
It's good to be cautious about nonprofit organizations, but in the case of DSI, they've been around a while, have a good reputation, and score well on third-party sites like Charity Navigator.
I'd also like to make clear that their Dark Sky Sanctuary certification isn't a scientific one based solely on light pollution, but also that the local/state/etc governments have implemented certain policies to help ensure the area remains a dark sky area. It's best to think of it akin to something like a designated "wilderness" or "wildlife sanctuary" area, but for starry skies. Because DSI works with governments to certify these areas, you're right that certain regions are likely to be more represented, and some not represented at all due to geographic and political barriers.
P.S. I'm not affiliated with DSI, but have used their accreditations in the past to pick wilderness areas to visit for hiking/camping/photography.