this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
367 points (95.1% liked)
Not The Onion
12295 readers
1440 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I just want portable water not in a plastic container. Also they're like a buck fifty.
All aluminum cans have a plastic epoxy liner.
So enjoy.
Yes and it's still infinitely recyclable, unlike plastic bottles. 70% of all aluminum ever produced is still in circulation thanks to how efficient aluminum recycling is, including epoxy lined cans.
So I will enjoy.
Does the liner contribute to microplastics in whatever is contained? Genuine question, that'd be a point against the epoxy liner. Of course any solution would have to include an effective replacement, so 🤷 Wax, maybe?
Yes, its also releasing BPA.
TIL 😢
Don't worry it's still recyclable
Epoxy is not plastic.
Except it is.
https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/98925/is-epoxy-resin-plastic
Reusable water bottle?
Yeah, I got mine for 98 cents a can. Highest price I've seen is like two bucks.
I got news for you about modern cans if you're trying to avoid plastic. They're lined with, you guessed it, plastic.
How much plastic? Not nearly the same amount and the bulk of the packaging is recyclable.
Not sure if the concern was based on recyclability or consumption of microplastics. If the concern is about waste, then they should be using a reusable container instead.