this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
104 points (60.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21273 readers
1604 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    My lower res, lower DPI display from my old Dell laptop looks much more sharp and crisp than the fancy pants Framework 13 high res display.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 31 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    Either the framework display sucks or there's something wrong with their setup. I'm staring at a high-res display at 200% scaling and it looks great

    [–] Fal@yiffit.net 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Nothing to do with the hardware. It's the lack of fractional scaling support and not knowing the workarounds

    [–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

    It’s the lack of fractional scaling support

    200% isn't fractional scaling, though

    load more comments (7 replies)