this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
680 points (99.3% liked)

Games

32545 readers
1606 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
shitpostpolice@lemmy.world
Dremor@lemmy.world
Dremor@jlai.lu
680
Steam :: Introducing Steam Families (steamcommunity.com)
submitted 8 months ago by Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
178 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Valve announced a replacement feature for both Family Sharing and Family View. Currently in beta.

Features:

  • up to 5 members
  • game sharing
  • parental controls
    • allow access to appropriate games
    • restrict access to the Steam Store, Community or Friends Chat
    • set playtime limits (hourly/daily)
    • view playtime reports
    • approve or deny requests from child accounts for additional playtime or feature access (temporary or permanent)
    • recover a child's account if they lost their password
  • child purchase requests
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 71 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If a family member gets banned for cheating while playing your copy of a game, you (the game owner) will also be banned in that game.

This is going to be hilarious. Can't wait to see the whining online.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 43 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Isn't that exactly the same as how it worked before?

There may have been a brief moment where that didn't happen, and then people discovered they could make cheat accounts, share their own games with them and get only the cheat accounts banned, and then make new ones and repeat.

[–] Jaybob32@lemmy.ca 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It is. My vac ban is currently 4990 days old. Thanks son!

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

TIL to make my future children their own steam accounts

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And buy them their own copies of online games.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Instead of the sax talk, I'm going to sit them down to chat about how cheating in video games is bad m'kay

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

Parents, talk to your kids about saxophones. That, and cheating on video games, are the most important subjects to cover.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Deleted: duplicate comment

[–] extant@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Currently each steam account is given a unique steam id number which is how most steam games identify the player and when you family share you are just associating that new steamid with your steamid so you can share certain purchases with if the developer allows it. Since each account is unique if I ban one it doesn't ban the other. In the past you could use the steam public web API to query a steamid to see if it was a family shared and it would respond with the parent account and you could compare that to your ban list and then ban the new account. A few years ago steam removed that capability for privacy protection and moved it to the game developers partner only access so a game developer could implement that same check but very few did and older or abandoned games are rife with cheaters now.

Now it would steam they are automagically making that check now or instead of a steam id it's a family id, I have no idea but if it prevents account whack-a-mole and brings back automation I'm all for it.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's the only way I can see it working. Otherwise, you could just make infinite cheat accounts.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

i mean theoretically they could just make it count as a strike, and if your account gets 3 strikes this way then your account is out as well

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago

That's two cheating incidents too many.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Well, 5 cheat accounts a year.