this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
126 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

7200 readers
365 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So are they going to be stopping buyers from buying more than 4L in multiple containers? Seems like that will generate more waste, this isn't an eco-friendly policy.

[–] strawberry@kbin.run 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

it seems like their issue is the price. "not priced responsibly"

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

My issue is honestly the marketing. Calling it "the party jug" pretty much tells everyone exactly what it's for, and let's just say it's probably not for your doctor recommended 1-2 drink daily maximum. Now I'm not a teetotaller or anything, but this is obviously directed at quite a young audience, which I think is a bit problematic.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it's marketed to young people, I think it's marketed to severe alcoholics. There are a shocking number of people who will go through this jug in a day or two.

I agree with the minister's concerns that it's too cheap. I recently moved from BC and it seems that bottom shelf hard liquor in general in Alberta is too cheap.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Calling it "the party jug" pretty much tells everyone exactly what it's for...

...sharing with a large group of people?

this is obviously directed at quite a young audience

To me it seems aimed at people that want to buy a lot of alcohol for not very much money, which tends to be young people, but they don't seem to have done anything in particular to target young people.

1 liter of vodka is more than enough to kill a healthy adult by alcohol poisoning. It's not the size of the container that prevents that. Are these 4 liter jugs less expensive than 1 liter bottles?

If you want to prevent alcohol deaths you should focus on addressing the causes of alcoholism (I'm not an expert but shooting from the hip: loneliness and hopelessness) and drunk driving (again, not an expert but: transit infrastructure).

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

1 liter of vodka is more than enough to kill a healthy adult by alcohol poisoning.

Laughs in Finnish

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

I definitely removed some qualifiers to avoid overly hedging my point, so yes I concede that not every healthy adult would be killed by consuming 1L of vodka in a single sitting.

Although I would also point out that a person that thinks that drinking a liter of vodka is laughably safe, is probably not healthy.

[–] Sprawlie@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You kind of countered your own comment at the end

One of the leading causes of alcoholism is cheap access to alcohol

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've done some toggling and found this article abstract.

and what I have to say is this:

Touche.

Key sentence:

The results also suggested that compared with general price increases, minimum- pricing policies might affect harmful drinkers proportionally more...

I guess I'd be pleased to see the provincial Alberta government embrace epidemiologically based policy making. Especially if they do it consistently and not just when it aligns with their ideology.

[–] Sprawlie@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

For alcohol, because of it's prevalence in society, yet known destructiveness, it is a very prickly topic. Historically we already know that prohibition is the worst solution to the problem and has far worse outcomes.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Why? Seems arbitrary to cry foul about that.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I personally think there should be some hard ethical bounds on marketing when it comes to potentially life wrecking substances. We do this for cigarettes, right?

Now I think humankind's relationship with alcohol is a bit more nuanced, but when alcohol packaging starts to look like sugary cereal boxes, that's where I draw the line. Admittedly this isn't quite there, but it's borderline IMO. I don't think we should be encouraging binge drinking by selling party sized mix packs like this.

Mind you, it's not the size or price that bothers me. My grandma always bought gallon bottles of booze from the US on the cheap, but they'd last her a few years. That's fine. Sell it without fun-dinosaur, and put on a boring-ass, noname vodka label, and it's fine by me.

Just an addendum, I feel similarly about marketing of sugary cereal to children.

Edit: Lol, why'd you ask if you were just going to downvote and not engage with the response?

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't vote on here, I never do. I didn't do anything to your post. You have your view. I think it's a bit arbitrary. Take it a step further and ban porn. It sounds like arbitrarily picking and choosing what you think is bad for society and needing to control society for them. Like the "video games cause violence" liars.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A very vague and relative metric. Seems very economical to me.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"Responsibly" here mean "more expensively", if you read the article. I'm not sure if this guy's specific issues is public health or protecting the competition. "I don't think a four-litre plastic jug of vodka adds to the quality of the distillery industry that we have in this province” kind of implies the latter.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Eh, that's like 10 bucks more than if you were to buy 4 1 litre smirnoffs.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm looking at vodka, this is also in America. But the price isn't that much higher. I was wrong about it being 15. It's actually 16.99.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Jesus christ yeah, ok. I should have narrowed my search by region.

Really puts into perspective how fucking easy it is to get alcohol in the U.S. Kinda scary actually.