this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
60 points (83.3% liked)

News

23296 readers
3203 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I've always kinda felt that a Venezuelan/Zimbabwean type currency crash has always been the end goal when it comes to US debt.

Borrow more money than exists many times over.

Spend the money

Devalue the underlying currency of the debt to effectively zero

Fuck over millions upon millions of people

But hey, the spending was, in the end, all free!

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

I dont think they've had that kind of foresight tbh. The goal is to make lots of money and kick the can of being fiscally responsible down the road to the next administration.

If a global USD is devalued that far, its not just bad for America.

[–] WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Every central bank system is a perpetual debt machine. It’s why the founding fathers specifically fought against them being established here. If you print the money then loan it to a government, how does the government pay that interest? Central bank loans the government $100 at 1% interest, even if they spend none of it, how do they pay the 1% when the issuer of the currency is also the loaner? Governments have to continue to accumulate debt in this system. They have always been a perpetual and compounding debt system.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The founding fathers also kept slaves and didn't let women vote. I'm tired of how Americans deify them, I suggest citing economists as authorities on economics instead of 18th century wealthy landowners.

[–] WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m not deifying them by mentioning something they got right. I’m tired of people’s all or nothing lack of nuance. Humanity would be nowhere without the advancements of flawed people from the past. We can’t use our measuring stick on their lives without a huge degree of hypocrisy considering how much society has changed even in the last half century. For all their short comings, the founding fathers did create the frame work that most modern democracies are built on and ushered humanity away from monarchy.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most modern democracies are parliamentary, actually. The US system has not been widely mimicked aside from cherry-picking a few specific details.

Also, monarchy and democracy are not mutually exclusive. I'm Canadian, for example, which is a democratic constitutional monarchy. We still have a king but we elect our government.

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but your king is basically a mascot. If they had any actual power, your system would be less democratic basically by definition.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 7 months ago

Sure, but that's adding quibbles beyond the scope of what I was responding to. We're a democracy and we still have a monarch.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They were the economists of their time. Basic economic theory hasn't changed in millennia, only opinion on how to manage economies has.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 7 months ago

There were economists in the 18th century and none of the founding fathers were one.

The closest was probably Alexander Hamilton, who ended up as the first treasury secretary. Where he proposed and set up the very central bank that the commenter I was responding to is complaining about.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Central bank loans the government $100 at 1% interest, even if they spend none of it, how do they pay the 1% when the issuer of the currency is also the loaner?

Taxes.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they're saying if we taxes everyone 100%... Collected all the money from everyone in the country, then gave it all back to the central bank we borrowed it from originally, we'd still owe the interest on the debt... With no more money in the system where would we get the "taxes"?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

As with most debt, it can't be paid off immediately or it wouldn't have been debt to being with. It's a bet on the future.

[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Worst part is, we all participate so we are the enabler. There are alternatives but people have mostly rejected as media told them it is bad.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It really does including on myself if I am not super diligent and aware. It is exhausting but is our reality.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Why default on loans when you can just get moar loans?!?!?

  • US Politicians talking about the debt ceiling
[–] Woozythebear@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean that's not what happened in Venezuela at all but ok...

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, I was more looking for examples of currencies that had crashed to near zero than the specific driving forces behind the illustrations, but ok.

[–] Woozythebear@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but you literally stated the reasons why...

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

we will end up at “end game scenario” we saw in X by these hypothetical steps, which are different steps to X but the same “end game scenario”

This isn’t a conceptually difficult hypothetical to follow.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Don't you understand? Every casual comment made in passing online needs to have been put through rigorous academic peer review and include citations on international economies and the mechanics of global currency exchanges, or the commenter must face complete social ridicule and ostracization. /s