this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
593 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
4025 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

An extra $100 takes you from 8GB to 64GB on a PC if you install it yourself.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you have a laptop that supports that, yeah. Which you should, but definitely isn't always true.

Used to be true on Macs...good ol' days

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

not by much; here in central europe a 2 module 64gb kit costs about 125€ (~135$ incl. VAT). not the greatest timings, but very much faster than the swapfile.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I do wish Apple had dimm slots for “slow” ram just to get the numbers up. IMO the 8GB model isn’t a serious offer and is to be ignored by anyone who tells the difference. That said, If I had only $200 for upgrades on a Mac I’d spend it on ssd. I had a 32/512 MacBook and I wish I’d paid up for 1TB. 16/1TB would’ve been more useful.