this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
581 points (94.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35737 readers
1157 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am asking here because all the political subs don't allow a question, and US politics used to seemed so simple until to understand this man came along.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnthoNightShift@lemmy.ca 259 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Because this needs to be done 1000% right, there is no margin for error, everything has to be done in an iron clad manner that cannot be dismantled by half-assing it. Indicting a former president is a first in the history of this country, and this former president is nothing short of a cult leader with millions of unshakable followers, many of whom are armed to the teeth and ready to burn this country to the ground for him. So this has to be done very friggin carefully.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like Mueller half-assed it and the end result was nearly a fucking coup. Can’t let that happen again.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mueller didn’t half ass anything. He conducted his investigation and determined that crimes were likely committed, but that he didn’t have the power to bring charges in his position as special counsel and it would be up to the AG.

Which is true. A DOJ special counsel is not the same thing as the independent counsel that used to exist, which was what Ken Starr was when he investigated Clinton.

A DOJ special counsel is completely beholden to the AG and DOJ policies and can’t bring charges without the AG signing off on them.

If you actually read the mueller report, it’s extremely damning and he turned it over to the AG and Congress to do something about it. The AG declined to bring any charges based on a DOJ memorandum that says a sitting POTUS cannot be charged. The House impeached Trump over the findings and the Senate failed to convict and remove him.

The current AG could still bring criminal charges over the conclusion of the report, but at this point it’s been so highly politicized that it would be impossible to get a conviction on.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop saying "the AG". Say his fucking traitor name. William Barr. Who only got cold feet at the 11th hour when the groundwork for the coup was already being made.

The Mueller report - as you say, damning - was completed and then given to this scum, who withheld it, released a "summary", claimed it found no wrongdoing whatsoever, eventually released a heavily redacted version...

I mean I remember it happening. This slimy fuck. He got a report that said the many ways Trump did illegal shit, but since he was the one who could choose when and how to release it, he was able to get ahead of the media by saying all kinds of bullshit lies. By the time he was finally forced to release the real report, it was too late, the "Trump did nothing wrong" story was already too far out there.

Look, I'm glad he finally, barely, by the skin of his teeth did the right thing and said there was no fraud in the 2020 election. But we should not forget that brazen bullshit he pulled in front of Congress and the American people.

[–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. It's insane we need to remember details like this but here we are.

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is exactly right

[–] Wincing5185@mastodon.online 2 points 1 year ago

@Earthwormjim91 I am wondering if that is the reason we are not seeing any of the Trump kinds getting indicted To not make it look like justice is hunting them and legitimize the poplitical lies?

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Muller half assed the investigation, on top of that corrupt Barr hid all the important findings, and Bitch McConnell swept the whole treason under the rug - that all lead Orange Man to be even bolder with his treason and rise of blatant lawlessness within the Republican Party.

I don’t disagree with what you said but I just wanted to point out how entire republican machinery is responsible for the imminent death of democracy in this country. Not just Muller’s half assed investigation.

[–] Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

unshakeable followers

You spelled ignorant morons wrong

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Holy shit you're in a pickle with this one America.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In addition to being done right, he has to be pampered. I hate him passionately, but I really mean that. Subjecting him to the indignities of stuff like handcuffs, a mugshot, an orange suit, etc will turn him into a martyr in the eyes of his cult followers. And while the rest of us would enjoy seeing it, that’s not necessarily bringing out the best in us either. Donald Trump is an enormous pot-stirrer and unless you really want the pot to boil over you need to tiptoe around him, as unfair as that is.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

turn him into a martyr in the eyes of his cult followers

they're gonna continue to be terrorists no matter what we do and I'm sick of bowing to their terrorism

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Choosing not to aggravate them is not bowing to them. Remember we’re talking about how we’ll prosecute Dear Leader. Get him where it counts, even if it has to be done quietly.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So why do we have to be so afraid of his followers that we are giving him special treatment to dissuade their violence? Instead of, you know, fighting back or having them jailed too. 🤦

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Nearly 63,000,000 people voted for trump in '16.

If even 1% of them are crazy fucks, that's 630,000 people to deal with. That's not something to take lightly.

Doesn't make it right, but it's another layer of complexity.

[–] 30mag@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

this former president is nothing short of a cult leader with millions of unshakable followers, many of whom are armed to the teeth and ready to burn this country to the ground for him

They didn't show up for the last coup, and I don't think he's gonna have another one.

[–] Innocent_Bystander@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How is it that different from indicting a sitting president...