this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
652 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2588 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google layoffs: The company plans to set up a new team in Munich, Germany which would act as "cheaper" labour, the report claimed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world 58 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The only staff who need firing is Sundar. Google and android should have been easy better by now but he made them stagnant.

Android is still the best mobile os but it could have been even better under better leadership. Plus they could have enabled and experimented with the OEM's to allow for additional hardware buttons, button remapping, a native Dex on all Androids, official gcam port to all OEM's so they don't need to make their own camera algorithms and even the cheapest droid could have had flagship level cameras.

And we haven't even touched on software yet....

Fire his useless ass

[–] ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Why would it be in googles interest to provide better cameras to OEMs? Google has to love that people buy pixel phones because other vendors cameras are years behind

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pixels are a minuscule fraction of Android devices. Google would get more money by improving Android than by trying to increase their own marketshare.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because the market is bigger than Pixels and they could license much of it (I'd like to see more of it as open source, but it's easier for a corporation to justify licensing the cutting edge stuff). I think a lot of OEMs would like access to Night Sight

[–] ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Of course a lot of OEMs would like it, but google is incentivised to keep the best part of Android as pixel exclusives.

[–] nasduia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Regardless of the actual software processing details, in the wider population of Android consumers I'm pretty sure it's Samsung that has the reputation for photography.

Samsung's advertising focus is on advertising things that people understand and think they want, not AI assistants and cleaner versions of Android. Most of the reviews of the Pixel 8 criticise no telephoto lens while Samsung tends to have an excess being shown off.

Like everything Google does, I'm not sure it is any good at understanding people as humans rather than people as aggregate statistical models and that shows in its consumer devices.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Samsung's 10x camera is amazing, I'm pretty miffed they dropped down to a digial zoom 10x though and made it a 5x on the S24 series, even if it gives other benefits like higher quality mid zooms between the 3x and 10x.

I really hope they bring it back or someone else has a good 10x lens by the time I need a new phone.

Fuck only having a 3x after having a 10x