Not The Onion

12187 readers

834 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

732

Second Boeing whistleblower dies suddenly (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 6 months ago by RobotToaster@mander.xyz to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but in the interest of not pretending that They Would Never(tm) can we all agree that if a THIRD whistleblower dies shortly before or during testimony that maybe something is happening here? You have the guy who committed suicide in the middle of depositions after telling his friend "If I commit suicide, no I absolutely did not" and now the healthy 45 year old who all of a sudden has multiple infections and a stroke. Is there a point at which you'd accept the idea that it's a bit beyond coincidence that the deadliest place in the world seems to be the witness stand at a trial where Boeing is the defendant?

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Didn't the first guy's family talk about how he was depressed out of his mind and barely knew the woman who made those claims?

You can blame Boeing for abusing and causing mental and ultimately physical deterioration of their QA staff. You can't blame them for faking suicide or giving someone pneumonia.

I still personally think that criminal charges need to be filed against their managers or coworkers, even if it's not for murder.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

I'm just trying to establish conditions by which we all might agree that this is worth looking into before they happen. It's easy to try to play connect the dots with the stars, there are a bunch of them already and you can just ignore the ones that don't make the picture you want. I'm trying to add predictions to this theory in the name of the scientific method - if another whistleblower dies before his testimony is complete, that will be beyond what I can dismiss as coincidence.