this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
370 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5241 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago (4 children)

No different than BMW having heated seats but if you want to use them you have to unlock with subscription plan. This way BMW makes one model and consumer has a choice with paymwnt. Intel CPUs have this too now. Company running servers can buy low performing chip, if they want to expand capability then intel sells them a license code to unlock more performance

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They're pushing the limits of this simulation to see how much bullshit we can tolerate. Turns out it's a LOT.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you pay the monthly subscription you can actually upgrade to the premium simulation.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm already paying a monthly sub! The devs made food and shelter basically mandatory, and then they charged for it! Biggest money grab ever, it's disgusting.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

That's the basic subscription, the premium one is extra.

[–] surfrock66@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If people are ok with that then I guess it will stand, but it's insane and anti-consumer in my book. A product costs what it costs, based on supply and demand, and if you can't afford it you don't buy it. This flimsy premise of "It lowers the bar to entry so users can upgrade later without having to replace!" will never come to fruition, and it's too slippery of a slope to "put in a quarter to turn on your A/C".

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Oh I hate it. Like Toyota was offering remote car start but only if you subscribed online, otherwise your remote start button would get blocked by software. They walked it back because of consumer backlash, but not enough consumers complain. Meanwhile Ford pattented a drive home feature so if you miss a car payment it cripples your car, and further non payment the vehicle will drive itself back to the dealership

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Toyota was offering remote car start but only if you subscribed online

That's different - it relies on having an active cellular connection in the car and older cell towers (5G has improved this dramatically) could only handle a hundred or so active connections at once, so Toyota is absolutely paying a monthly fee to access the cell network. It makes sense to pass that on to the customers who wish to use the feature.

Those fees have gone down, since not only is 5G much cheaper per customer (for the cell network), everyone switching to 5G has taken the pressure off older wireless protocols so they're almost never crowded anymore - so they can pretty much have as many cars connected as they want for near zero cost.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

There is no need for access to a cell signal amd a server though, when you wamt to clicl start.from your living room.. You can use the same fob tech as lock umlock your car like cars had prior. Or. you can buy after market remote start kits, Toyota waa juat frying to jump on the SaaS bandwagon

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Imagine telling this to a time traveler from the 20th Century. "You have self-driving cars?" "Yeah, how else will they get back to the dealership when you miss a payment?" LOL fuck this timeline.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Collapsing dystopia into reality everyday

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure BMW ditched the subscription seats plan in the US due to pissing off car shoppers.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

They may have, Toyota ditched their "subscribe monthly to remote start your car" after outrage

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're giving more examples of things that aren't ok. People should have full control over the software on the products they buy, if they did trying to software-lock anything wouldn't work.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Oh I know, its absolute shit. My only point was Tesla doing it is not new, it's how manufacturers have saved costs on making muliple product configurations.