this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
263 points (87.0% liked)

News

37814 readers
2465 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A tiny, low-priced electric car called the Seagull has American automakers and politicians trembling.

The car, launched last year by Chinese automaker BYD, sells for around $12,000 in China, but drives well and is put together with craftsmanship that rivals U.S.-made electric vehicles that cost three times as much. A shorter-range version costs under $10,000.

Tariffs on imported Chinese vehicles probably will keep the Seagull away from America’s shores for now, and it likely would sell for more than 12 grand if imported.

But the rapid emergence of low-priced EVs from China could shake up the global auto industry in ways not seen since Japanese makers exploded on the scene during the oil crises of the 1970s. BYD, which stands for “Build Your Dreams,” could be a nightmare for the U.S. auto industry.

“Any car company that’s not paying attention to them as a competitor is going to be lost when they hit their market,” said Sam Fiorani, a vice president at AutoForecast Solutions near Philadelphia. “BYD’s entry into the U.S. market isn’t an if. It’s a when.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 88 points 2 years ago (3 children)

A tiny, low-priced electric car called the Seagull has American automakers and politicians trembling.

Hyperbole as rhetorical device is getting exhausting and makes me extremely skeptical.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

This whole article is just paid marketing. Some AP journalist didn't tear this car down and analyze its build quality.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Specially when you see the stats and it has a 190-250 mile range and a max speed of 81 MPH. And even the article points out they cut costs with things like having only one windshield wiper.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

it has a 190-250 mile range and a max speed of 81 MPH

That's further than I'd drive before a 20 minute rest stop, and faster than it's legal to drive anywhere in the US, except for Texas State Highway 130.

And even the article points out they cut costs with things like having only one windshield wiper.

As opposed to the Cybertruck, which has a revolutionary, but very expensive, design featuring only one windshield wiper.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 14 points 2 years ago

Cybertruck is a bad comparison, everyone already knows that thing is a steaming pile of hot garbage.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

I don't think comparing it to cybertruck is really a win. I could be in a bubble, but I hear nothing but terrible things about them.

Also, anecdotally, going on long family trips in my van, I frequently do 350 miles between stops on 900 mile trips. I'd say 80 is a typical speed on the Ohio turnpike, but I'd be a little worried about driving that thing pedal to the floor for 2-3 hours straight (no worries though, it'll never get that range at full speed).

That said, hey if this car meets your needs I'm all for that. Everyone should have options. I would consider buying one for my kids when they start driving as long as it's safe in accidents.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It also doesn't meet US auto safety standards.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah here in the uk there's plenty of good charging points, woodland trust and national trust are putting them in at a lot of locations so I could plan a relaxing walk in the woods with my journey if I ever needed to go more than 150 miles, I think that would be really nice.

Supermarkets have tave them too, so I could plan getting the shopping I need for the trip while it charges, this would allow me to avoid predatory pricing at garages too.

I just looked on a road distance map and it's about where I would normally stop for a break, I've done longer drives but only rarely and I can't think of a time an excuse to stop for a walk in the woods wouldn't have been welcomed.

Oh and I only have one wiper but it was made by Hyundai so I guess it gets a pass lol

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] steakmeoutt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago

You're welcome