this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
588 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

11843 readers
515 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 51 points 4 months ago (3 children)

From reading the article, I get the impression that this bill is mostly about them wanting to be able to arrest protesters who wear masks to hide their identity.

Which is still really shitty, to be clear.

[–] akakunai@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago

Them's the small government folks for ya...

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

It's so stupid. Like, if the protesters do something illegal (actually illegal that is) then even if they have a mask on you can arrest them and make them take it off for mugshots. Also medical masks don't really cover enough of the face to prevent identification.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But then that wouldn't be for health reasons, right?

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

Right, but any kind of "you can't wear a mask in public" law is easily evaded if there's a legal exception for wearing one for health reasons.