Technology

59427 readers

3000 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

830

Tesla must face fraud suit for claiming its cars could fully drive themselves (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I thought the consensus was that Tesla is far behind, hence why Mercedes is the first brand to actually have some basic level 3 automomus driving actually to customers

Yeah that seems to be the consensus but I have no idea what it's based on. When the Mercedes system is put against FSD it looks like this. The level 3 driving is available only on a handful of highways between LA, SF and LV and even then only in ideal weather and traffic conditions.

If the competition really is ahead then where are all the videos of their vehicles doing what FSD does? There are countless accounts on YouTube demonstrating the capabilities of FSD driving both on highways and in cities but nothing about these other brands.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I have no idea what it’s based on.

It's obviously based on other makers being ahead.

Mercedes, Waymo, GM, MobilEye, Nvidia are all ahead, making Tesla #6 at best.

When the Mercedes system is put against FSD it looks like this.

Are you misleading on purpose? Or are you really that dense?

https://www.mbusa.com/en/owners/manuals/drive-pilot

Mercedes Calls their version of fully autonomous driving: Drive Pilot but you show a comparison to a way more basic Driving Assistant, which is nowhere close!

This comparison shows that Tesla FSD in reality is merely a drive assist.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Are you misleading on purpose?

The level 3 driving is available only on a handful of highways between LA, SF and LV and even then only in ideal weather and traffic conditions.

Stated clearly in the very next sentence.

This comparison shows that Tesla FSD in reality is merely a drive assist.

Always has been. That video compares drive assist to another. Apples to apples comparison. What exactly is the issue here?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Mercedes: Requirements to be used Legally.
Tesla: Not Legal unverified results.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

this

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

Why don't you ask the experts that rather than a random lemming like me? And why don't you ask Elon why he keeps claiming it's capable of more than it actually is?

I honestly don't care enough about it to do research, but you seem to. And i'd just love for guys like Elon to stop lying about what they have.