this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
307 points (94.8% liked)

News

35724 readers
2988 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The solution isn't making driving easier, it's making the alternatives superior. If public transportation is slower than driving, then that is a policy failure.

And in a world where there are viable alternatives to driving, people that do need to drive will get around faster, not slower.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You missed the blue collar part. I use a van full of tools for my previous employment. Tools that are not allowed on public transport.

I walk on a bus with chainsaws (I used 2 today) I'm going to have an interview with some cops.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, but ideally only people who genuinely need to use cars do so, which would include situations like yours. But not:

  • Commutes to office jobs
  • Errands that people could easily walk or cycle to if it was safe and convenient
  • Visits to friends and family
  • Groceries, restaurants, etc
  • Traveling to most towns and cities

In that world, there would be a lot less traffic and you would get to your job a lot quicker. And the rest of us won't be tethered to an expensive object that is only required because of bad government policy. But I get that during that transition there will be some teething pains, and sometimes governments will get it wrong, and it's unfortunate that it has affected you. Ultimately though, it's very much a necessary change.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

Ideally those who “genuinely” need a car can prove it by endeavoring to get a car.

I hope that “genuine need” isn’t the purview of somebody else, who gets to decide what’s a valuable use of the road or not.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

Your career is a small price to pay for making someone else’s life easier.

You gotta remember those government decisions, that let you run your own tool-using business without permission from the car czar, are bad policy that’s ruining life for people tethered to their cars.

Don’t worry though: your car situation would be approved. It’s all the other people who’d be forced to take the bus. Not you, comrade.

Of course you’d be able to keep your career after our great change has happened. For now, remember that your career is a sacrifice … the birth pains of our brave new world of buses.

Thank you for your cooperation. As soon as the revolution is complete you may resume your work in complete freedom.

/s

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

The solution isn't making driving harder; it's making the alternatives superior

Isn’t this what you mean? Instead of using the stick, they should be using the carrot. Instead of making the current choice more painful, make the new choice more desirable. That way we can move forward into the future while actually increasing the amount of utility we get from our decisions.