this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
64 points (94.4% liked)

movies

1765 readers
183 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With ticket sales down and newly released movies hitting streaming and video-on-demand (VOD) services in record time, it's not surprising that films are struggling to make it big in theaters. For comparison, 2015's Mad Max: Fury Road grossed a whopping $45 million over a non-holiday opening weekend, which ultimately led to an impressive $380 million global box office draw. Meanwhile, Furiosa, which is equally well-received, earned just $32 million over the four days that make up Memorial Day weekend. Sadly, Hollywood's slump is becoming much more of a pattern, and there are clear-cut reasons why.

They are:

  1. The Movie Theater Experience Isn't Always Great
  2. Movie Theaters Are Expensive
  3. Bigger Budgets Puts Greater Box Office Expectations On Some Movies
  4. The COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Moviegoing Habit
  5. Audiences Have Been Conditioned That New Theatrical Releases Will Quickly Go To VOD
  6. Streaming Means There's More Choice At Home Than In Theaters
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The movie from 1979, from 1981, from 1985? Maybe the movie from 2015, or the spin-off from this year?

[–] JowlesMcGee@kbin.social -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just because it's a sequel doesn't mean it's derivative. All 5 movies are directed by the same guy. I can't speak for the first 3, but if you saw the 2015 movie and couldn't tell that it was a passion project, then I don't know what to tell you. We don't call Sherlock Holmes soulless even though Doyle wrote over 50 short stories starring Holmes.

It's entirely possible for someone to be creatively invested in a world they've built and want to keep exploring it in future works.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I absolutely love the Mad Max series, but I’ll be the first to say that yes, it’s derivative, except for the very first one.

All the others follow the same formula: Max Rockatansky wanders into a shitty situation while dealing with Bad Guys™️. Shitty situation escalates and ropes him in. He reluctantly helps and, with a ragtag team of anti-heroes, they save the day at a great cost. Max is left to wander the Outback once more.

It’s a great formula, I love it, but I won’t blame anyone for not wanting to watch more of the same.

[–] dingus182@endlesstalk.org 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In '85, they brought on Tina Turner just to cash in on previous releases. Kinda like casting JLo or Beyonce in another Mad Max and expecting it to do better.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

She did a bang up job, though.

[–] dingus182@endlesstalk.org 2 points 5 months ago

I'm glad you enjoyed it. I love Tina's music.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -2 points 5 months ago

If you're being that reductive then you're describing like 10% of all movies.