this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
57 points (96.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35808 readers
1920 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been going through updating all of my accounts (passwords, 2FA, etc.), and I've noticed that there are a lot of sites that don't offer any form of MFA.

I can understand smaller services that might not have the bandwidth, but surely larger organisations are able to get this setup?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zorro@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (5 children)

The worst here are financial institutions. What do I want the most security on? My money.

I get that they have regulations, but it annoys me all the time.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

The worst part of those is when they do support 2FA, but it's text-only. No app authentication or hardware key option.

Like it's something, but it's easily the least secure option, and probably the most expensive since it requires operating an additional SMS portal for those codes.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

As a developer who has worked on similar systems, I can see why it likely ended up that way. Not justifying it, only understanding it.

In the case of banks, it's likely that;

  • They needed to make 2FA mandatory for all customers, rather than opt-in. This means they needed an MFA method which a person of any technical competency can use. SMS is the "lowest common denominator" here, so they chose it.

  • The cost of sending SMS messages is high, but banks are (unsurprisingly) rich and can afford it

It would be great if banks offered better MFA methods, but development time in old-school banks is often ridiculously long as it is a very risk-averse industry that is also slowed down a lot by bureaucracy. It's likely they would choose something else on the roadmap, and stick with SMS as simply "good enough"

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

SMS 2fa on banks is not as bad as you’d think.

  1. They settled on SMS before there really were choices, and banks are slow to change
  2. Banks long since realized SMS was inadequate and use additional security. I imagine all banks in US, but certainly the biggest ones, invested in profiling software that looks at your behavior and device to rate every transaction by additional risk factors. They’re already pretty confident nothing bad is going on
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Pornhub has better account security than my bank, which ONLY has an option for a 6-digit numeric password, with no 2fa at all

[–] anas@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

This one I can understand, if something somehow goes wrong with your 2FA you’re locked out of your money

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No you're not?! You seriously think the bank would just say "nope. No 2FA you're fucked all your monies are ours now".

[–] anas@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

yeah that’s fair, I wasn’t thinking lol

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not if you can walk into a branch.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not every financial institution has brick and mortar locations.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

I know, which is why I said IF.