this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
342 points (96.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9626 readers
519 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Forcing bikes into conflict with cars is of course going to create problems. When I first started riding being on a sidewalk was fine. If that wasn’t available there was usually a sufficiently wide breakdown lane. Only fools and couriers rode in busy urban environments. But with the big push for bikes both municipally and on the basis of personal preference they had to get bikes out of conflict wirh pedestrians on sidewalks, but in built-up urban environments where there isn’t any room to put in proper bike lanes. It’s just a recipe for inflamed tempers. Even on roads that are more suburban, a couple of 18mph bikes blocking a 45 mph road is stupid even if they have a right to be there. But we need more bikes.

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

what is crazy is 45mph stroads in the suburbs

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why is that crazy? Busy roads in suburban areas are quite often in the 45-35mph range. My street is 30. The main road it connects to is 45. The major road that connects to is also 45. Where I lived previously was 40.

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

it's far too fast for residential areas, even for access roads they should probably be restricted to 30mph until you get out of the residential area. The main problem is of course the high speeds are dangerous, discouraging mixed use of roads in residential areas. it's one of the reasons americans in suburbs can't imagine walking somewhere, along with zoning law issues of course.

it's really part of a couple of interconnected issues with american suburb design (in my opinion as a non-american who has only visited some suburbs in the us)

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is such a crazy take. You want me going 15mph on the sidewalk?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I literally said we had to remove the bikes from sidewalks to separate them from pedestrians. What’s crazy about that?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

No, we'd want cyclists going a sensible speed on the sidewalk when the road is too dangerous to cycle on.

Frankly if a road has traffic going >30mph on it, I'm not cycling on it without a dedicated cycle lane, and I don't just mean a thin line painted in the gutter.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

No, riding on the sidewalk was never "fine". I know it FEELS more safe, but cyclists are struck more often and killed more often per km of sidewalk than road. And I am never okay with pushing risk off on other people because I'm afraid to accept it myself; even if riding on the sidewalk were safer for me, it is less safe for everyone else, so I don't fucking do it.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Dude(ette), I’m over 50. It was “fine” in the sense that it was what we all did and there were rarely any rules against it. I don’t know where you’re getting that I said it was acceptable in the modern context, in fact I stated pretty much the opposite. You’re making controversy where there really isn’t any.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

I am 47 and this has been the case my entire life. We have data.