this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
1105 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
2836 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Beryl@lemmy.world 220 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (28 children)

There's a typo in the title. If you go back to the original source (in french), they actually retain 79,5 % of their original efficiency, so even better than the article's title would have you believe.

[–] einkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 81 points 5 months ago (25 children)

I guess we can blame the French's confusing number system for that.

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 55 points 5 months ago (17 children)

People seem to be angry at you for not knowing how the French count. My condolences. I found it funny tho. Have un upvote

[–] einkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 56 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Well, I DO know how the French count and compared to English it IS highly confusing. You can hardly convince me that saying "Four times twenty and ten" is as straight forward as saying "Nine tens".

And just to be clear: I'm not some Yankee or Brit with a superiority complex, no, I am German, and we have our own shitty version of this: Instead of moving along the digits from highest to lowest, as in "Four hundreds and two tens and nine", we do "Four hundred and nine and two tens".

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wow, it’s like US uses metric system for counting and y’all do “imperial counting”

[–] einkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 months ago
[–] Beryl@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It supposedly comes from originaly counting in base 20 ( a.k.a : vigesimal system) in some proto-european language. There are traces of it in breton, albanese, basque and danish for example. Even in english, there is a reminiscence of vigesimal, in the "score", see for example Lincoln's Gettysburg Address "Fourscore and seven years ago..." means 87 years ago.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

But Basque isnt an Indo-European language its a Paleo-European isolate. Cultural mixing not with standing.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 5 months ago

And don't even get started with Danish.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

What the hell is wrong with y'all?

[–] FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's less confusing if you think of 70 and 90 as separate words without trying to analyze what their constituting words mean.

But etymologically, sure, it makes no sense.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Instead of moving along the digits from highest to lowest, as in “Four hundreds and two tens and nine”, we do “Four hundred and nine and two tens”.

English is less consistent, going from nine-teen to twenty-one. German stays consistent with its lower two digits.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 8 points 5 months ago

From 11 to 19 is always kind of weird in many languages. In Italian you go from essentially saying "one-ten" "two-ten"..."six-ten" to "ten-seven" "ten-eight" "ten-nine". Then it goes in like in English. Why? No reason ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Smc87@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The dude was saying people are angry at you because they don’t understand, not that you dont understand.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)