Not The Onion

12319 readers

598 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

AI candidate running for Parliament in the U.K. says AI can humanize politics (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 5 months ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cross posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16498799

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] towerful@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I had a huge rant about this, but ditched it.

Steve is the actual politician, but will vote according to crowd sourced opinions on the topics.
And that's where AI Steve comes in. AI Steve helps generate policy ideas, and they are voted on by the approved community members. Parliamentary topics are also voted on by approved community members.
So AI Steve is the lube, but it's essentially direct democracy for the approved community members.

So, very cool idea (the direct democracy).
No idea if it would work on a wider/country scale.
Of course it's a Tory doing it.
Pretty sure this could be done just with an online voting/polling platform and 1 or 2 people doing data entry/gathering.

However, the "better than the past few PMs" is a dangerous rhetoric. Cause all it needs is also a "both sides the same, labour is Tory lite, etc", and suddenly a bunch of voters will vote disruptively and we get Brexit 2.0 (whatever that might be).
Voting disruptively is absolutely fine, but I'm fairly sure it's the easiest method for foreign influences to meddle in elections

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

By the last few I meant everything since Cameron. I don't actually have very high hopes for Labour but things really can't get worse.