Not The Onion

12288 readers

2000 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

687

The Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treat (www.vox.com)

submitted 4 months ago by MHLoppy@fedia.io to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Snyder v. US is the Republican justices’ latest decision weakening anti-corruption laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The Supreme Court even today has over twice the approval rating as Congress (that's not saying much). Overthrowing one branch of government seems like a novel idea. There is a process for removing justices but it's never been done before. Only one justice has been impeached, Samuel Chase, and he wasn't even removed from the bench.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I want to overthrow everything. Just.....just all of it. The corrupt leaders. The corrupt police. The capitolistic system which encourages exploitation. The conditions which lead to poverty. The systemic racism. Just.......just delete, start new file.

What should we call this new country? I'm thinking "Whoopsiedaisy" has a nice ring to it.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I honestly don't think the US would come out the other end of a civil war or rebellion as just one country

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Could be. Its next to impossible to accurately get the details right on hypotheticals. But what your saying isn't far fetched. I can see Texas being a country......and reintroducing slaves.

I mean....I'm joking, but I also wouldn't put it past them.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

If everything was started from scratch tomorrow, the likelihood of present day California and Texas naturally ending up together in the same nation is pretty much zero, IMHO.

Those two are kept together by pretty much a country-sized version of a Sunken Cost Falacy.

One can't even count on language or culture as a unifying element, otherwise the whole of Latin America would be 2 countries, Brasil & Everybody Else.

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

Is removing a justice more or less difficult than adding more justices?