this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
25 points (64.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35772 readers
963 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Title

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

RFK has significantly less lunacy than Trump, and is much more coherent than both Biden and Trump.

He still supports Israel though, so there is no anti genocide candidate.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

RFK is less coherent than Biden politically and intellectually, which is what matters.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The way RFK makes (coherent) arguments in public is streets ahead of Biden and Trump, but so is almost any politician.

In terms of honesty, RFK is between Biden and Trump. Half truths and populism, rather than the full lies of Trump.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, it isn't. He's a conspiracy theorist. Voting for him is endorsing conspiracy theorists.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Tuskegee experiment is not the same as Flat Earth. Conspiracy theories are not a homogeneous and neither are conspiracy theorists.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Tuskegee Experiment was not a conspiracy theory. So, in that sense you're right.

Conspiracy theories and theorists are homogenous: the flawed thinking is inherent to the concept. Conspiracy theories are untrue by definition, and nothing to do with real conspiracies.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Fuck off. The Tuskegee Experiment was a conspiracy. A group of people secretly performed illegal medical experiments on the African American population.

Conspiracy theories and theorists are homogenous.

Only within each conspiracy. Oliver Stone believes the JFK conspiracy theory but I doubt he believes the elite are literally lizard people.

the flawed thinking is inherent to the concept

Incorrect. An illegal agreement between two or more parties has no connection to how logical the process is of whoever is suspicious.

Conspiracy theories are untrue by definition,

Incorrect. They are unproven by definition. They may be true or false.

and nothing to do with real conspiracies.

Real (I assume you mean proven) conspiracies start off as theories.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Real (I assume you mean proven) conspiracies start off as theories.

No, they don't. Conspiracy theories are not 'theories about conspiracies'. You are both misusing the term 'conspiracy theory' and wrongly describing the Tuskegee experiment as a conspiracy, which it never was. One of the people who originally called it out did so after reading about it in a published scientific paper! The pereptrators of that 'experiment' lied to the participants, but they were not otherwise secretive, otherwise they wouldn't have been writing and publishing papers about it.

Fuck off

I'm not going to discuss this further with someone who cannot do so civilly.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You are misusing the term 'conspiracy theory'

I am not. The words conspiracy and theory are very well defined. Do the words scientific and theory change definition to "untrue physical properties" when used together. No.

Lets put it another way. How would you like to describe a situation where you suspect a group of people to be secretly deceiving the general public?

The pereptrators of that 'experiment' lied to the participants, but they were not otherwise secretive, otherwise they wouldn't have been writing and publishing papers about it.

Conspiracies can be documented. The only reason MKUltra was confirmed was because the CIA forgot to destroy some files.

"Study clinicians could have chosen to treat all syphilitic subjects and close the study, or split off a control group for testing with penicillin. Instead, they continued the study without treating any participants; they withheld treatment and information about penicillin from the subjects. In addition, scientists prevented participants from accessing syphilis treatment programs available to other residents in the area".

That's a conspiracy.

I'm not going to discuss this further with someone who cannot do so civilly.

Check my history. I am civil, except to people trying to deny secret government sponsored human suffering.