Technology

60082 readers

4255 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

1019

Google Chrome warns uBlock Origin may soon be disabled (www.bleepingcomputer.com)

submitted 4 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

447 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Will a pihole fill this void?

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Switching to Firefox might!

[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I'm already on Firefox, I just meant in general

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 23 points 4 months ago

Not at the same level. Ublock can remove way more granular spam and ads than pihole, which is limited at DNS requests. I use both... Running Firefox of course.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

its also available on firefox, de manifested version of chromium are likely to crop up, idk. Depends on how cancer it is to rip that shit out.

[–] TheOneCurly@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Re-manifested? To fix it you have to reenable manifest v2. That should be simple for a while but will get more problematic over time.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

de v3 versions, obviously. Mozilla has no intentions of implementing it, and if chrome kills v2, it's not impossible that mozilla can hit them with an anti trust case and win, considering this is arguably what that would be.

But it will probably start to break on individual shitty websites over time, as per usual unfortunately.

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

To an extent. But it wouldn't surprise me at all if sometime in the near future they force the use their own DNS servers within their browser instead of respecting your network configuration.

The best solution to circumventing Chrome's bad behavior is to not use it.

Edit: speiling

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Man you gotta edit this again, you miss spelled spelling.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You misspelled misspelled.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 5 points 4 months ago

I'm just living up to my username!

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

i've got a few using the mv3 'lite' version of ubo here. seems to be sufficient--for now.