I hope questions are allowed here. I am curios if there is a different sort of scientific calendar which does not use the birth of Jesus as a reference like AD and BC. For example Kurzgesagt's calendars use the the current year plus 10000 as this represents the human better or something like that.

Would there be a way to do this more accurately? How could we, in a scientific correct way, define a reference from where we are counting years?

Also I have read about the idea of having 13 months instead of 12 would be "nice" because then we could have a even distributed amount of days per month.

Are there already ideas for this? What would you recommend to read?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

On this point, it would be stupidly hard.

Just from a programming and software perspective. All the old code that runs banks and the back end of air travel. It barely runs as it is, do a switch up of years, even leaving the months alone and it would probably freak out. Standadize the months while you are at it and the whole thing falls apart.

Are you old enough to remember Y2K? That required a lot of techs to spend a huge amount of time fixing code that was never intended to see years change from 19xx to now just even consider 20xx.

That is before we go about changing paper Birth Documents, marriage documents, house deads, ..... Should I go on?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a good way to fix these mass layoffs in tech.

[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago

I like your optimism, fairly unrealistic but the optimism is nice to see

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Haha I would talk about to time keeping in sw but glad I don't to anymore